Psychological medicine · 2021
The neural substrates of risky rewards and losses in healthy volunteers and patient groups: a PET imaging study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Skandali Nikolina, Majuri Joonas, Joutsa Juho, Baek Kwangyeol, Arponen Eveliina, Forsback Sarita, Kaasinen Valtteri, Voon Valerie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Risk is an essential trait of most daily decisions. Our behaviour when faced with risks involves evaluation of many factors including the outcome probabilities, the valence (gains or losses) and past experiences. Several psychiatric disorders belonging to distinct diagnostic categories, including pathological gambling and addiction, show pathological risk-taking and implicate abnormal dopaminergic, opioidergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. In this study, we adopted a transdiagnostic approach to delineate the neurochemical substrates of decision making under risk.
METHODS: We recruited 39 participants, including 17 healthy controls, 15 patients with pathological gambling and seven binge eating disorder patients, who completed an anticipatory risk-taking task. Separately, participants underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with three ligands, [18F]fluorodopa (FDOPA), [11C]MADAM and [11C]carfentanil to assess presynaptic dopamine synthesis capacity and serotonin transporter and mu-opioid receptor binding respectively.
RESULTS: Risk-taking behaviour when faced with gains positively correlated with dorsal cingulate [11C]carfentanil binding and risk-taking to losses positively correlated with [11C]MADAM binding in the caudate and putamen across all subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: We show distinct neurochemical substrates underlying risk-taking with the dorsal cingulate cortex mu-opioid receptor binding associated with rewards and dorsal striatal serotonin transporter binding associated with losses. Risk-taking and goal-directed control appear to dissociate between dorsal and ventral fronto-striatal systems. Our findings thus highlight the potential role of pharmacological agents or neuromodulation on modifying valence-specific risk-taking biases.
METHODS: We recruited 39 participants, including 17 healthy controls, 15 patients with pathological gambling and seven binge eating disorder patients, who completed an anticipatory risk-taking task. Separately, participants underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with three ligands, [18F]fluorodopa (FDOPA), [11C]MADAM and [11C]carfentanil to assess presynaptic dopamine synthesis capacity and serotonin transporter and mu-opioid receptor binding respectively.
RESULTS: Risk-taking behaviour when faced with gains positively correlated with dorsal cingulate [11C]carfentanil binding and risk-taking to losses positively correlated with [11C]MADAM binding in the caudate and putamen across all subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: We show distinct neurochemical substrates underlying risk-taking with the dorsal cingulate cortex mu-opioid receptor binding associated with rewards and dorsal striatal serotonin transporter binding associated with losses. Risk-taking and goal-directed control appear to dissociate between dorsal and ventral fronto-striatal systems. Our findings thus highlight the potential role of pharmacological agents or neuromodulation on modifying valence-specific risk-taking biases.