DOI 10.1016/j.jaut.2026.103562
Impact of a ketogenic diet on clinical outcomes and immunological markers in myasthenia gravis: A randomized pilot study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by fluctuating weakness and disabling fatigue. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and explored potential clinical and immunological effects of a ketogenic diet (KD) in generalized MG.
METHODS
In a randomized, controlled, open-label 12-week pilot study, adults with generalized MG were assigned to a KD (n = 20) or to continue their habitual diet (n = 21). The primary endpoint was change in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL). Secondary outcomes included Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), MGFA class, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QoL15r), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), serum calprotectin (sCLP), serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), and T-cell subsets. Analyses were conducted descriptively using effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Numerical improvements were observed in the KD group compared to controls. MG-ADL decreased (median Δ -2; moderate effect size, 95% CI including zero). QMG improved (median Δ -3; effect size 1.29, 95% CI 0.55-2.02), and fatigue decreased (median Δ -7; effect size 1.19, 95% CI 0.45-1.91). MG-QoL15r and PASS remained stable in the intervention group but worsened in controls. sCLP showed a numerical decrease, while sNfL remained unchanged. Adherence, defined as study completion, was 75%.
CONCLUSION
A ketogenic diet is feasible and safe. Numerical improvements in clinical outcomes, and exploratory immunological changes were observed. Given the exploratory design findings should be interpreted with caution and require confirmation in larger, blinded studies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.