The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2023
Morphological Studies to Identify the Nasopalatine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Using a Special Head and Neck MRI Coil.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grandoch Andrea, Oeser Julia, Zöller Joachim E, Große Hokamp Nils, Lichtenstein Thorsten, Neugebauer Jörg
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery bear a high risk of nerve damage. Three-dimensional imaging techniques can optimize surgical planning and help to spare nerves. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner with a dedicated dental signal amplification coil for the assessment of nerves in the oral cavity as compared with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS: Based on 6 predefined criteria, the assessability of the inferior alveolar and nasopalatine nerves in CBCT and MRI with a dedicated 4-channel dental coil were compared in 24 patients.
RESULTS: Compared with CBCT, MRI with the dental coil showed significantly better evaluability of the inferior alveolar nerve in the sagittal and axial plane and the nasopalatine nerve in the axial plane. In the sagittal plane; however, the assessability of the nasopalatine nerve was significantly better in CBCT as compared with MRI. Yet, pertaining to overall assessability, no significant differences between modalities were found.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, it can be reported that 1.5- T MRI with a dedicated dental coil is at least equivalent, if not superior, to CBCT in imaging nerve structures of the stomatognathic system.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preoperative, 3-dimensional images are known to simplify and refine the planning and execution of operations in maxillofacial surgery. In contrast to computed tomography and CBCT, MRI does not cause radiation exposure while enabling visualization of all relevant hard and soft tissues and, therefore, holds an advantage over well-established techniques.
METHODS: Based on 6 predefined criteria, the assessability of the inferior alveolar and nasopalatine nerves in CBCT and MRI with a dedicated 4-channel dental coil were compared in 24 patients.
RESULTS: Compared with CBCT, MRI with the dental coil showed significantly better evaluability of the inferior alveolar nerve in the sagittal and axial plane and the nasopalatine nerve in the axial plane. In the sagittal plane; however, the assessability of the nasopalatine nerve was significantly better in CBCT as compared with MRI. Yet, pertaining to overall assessability, no significant differences between modalities were found.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, it can be reported that 1.5- T MRI with a dedicated dental coil is at least equivalent, if not superior, to CBCT in imaging nerve structures of the stomatognathic system.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preoperative, 3-dimensional images are known to simplify and refine the planning and execution of operations in maxillofacial surgery. In contrast to computed tomography and CBCT, MRI does not cause radiation exposure while enabling visualization of all relevant hard and soft tissues and, therefore, holds an advantage over well-established techniques.