Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026
Evaluation and comparison of voided urine and bladder washing cytologies according to the Paris system.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bulut Asiye Şafak, Kızılkan Yalçın
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Cystoscopy, biopsy, and urine cytology are gold standards for the diagnosis and surveillance of bladder carcinoma. Bladder washings, obtained via cystoscopy or by catheterization, are common in routine cytology practice, whereas voided urine is evaluated less frequently. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative cytologic assessment of voided urine and bladder washing specimens in patients with bladder carcinoma.
METHODS: In this prospective study, second-morning voided urine and bladder washing samples were obtained from 75 patients with histologically confirmed bladder carcinoma over a 3-year period. Samples were re-evaluated cytologically according to the Paris system.
RESULTS: Bladder washing cytology showed higher sensitivity (81 vs. 62%) and the correlation coefficient (0.617 vs. 0.487), compared to voided urine cytology.
CONCLUSION: While bladder washing cytology showed superior diagnostic performance with a higher area under the curve and sensitivity in this cohort, voided urine cytology remains a valuable non-invasive alternative despite its lower sensitivity.
METHODS: In this prospective study, second-morning voided urine and bladder washing samples were obtained from 75 patients with histologically confirmed bladder carcinoma over a 3-year period. Samples were re-evaluated cytologically according to the Paris system.
RESULTS: Bladder washing cytology showed higher sensitivity (81 vs. 62%) and the correlation coefficient (0.617 vs. 0.487), compared to voided urine cytology.
CONCLUSION: While bladder washing cytology showed superior diagnostic performance with a higher area under the curve and sensitivity in this cohort, voided urine cytology remains a valuable non-invasive alternative despite its lower sensitivity.