Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry · 2026
Dental Caries Experience in Older Adults With Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Drumond Victor Zanetti, de Oliveira Thaís Alves, de Arruda José Alcides Almeida, Pavione Raissa Costa Leal, Rocha Najara Barbosa, Mesquita Ricardo Alves, Abreu Lucas Guimarães
Аннотация
AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed whether individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) have higher dental caries rates than those without PD.
METHODS: Seven electronic databases and gray literature sources were systematically searched for observational studies comparing dental caries between individuals with and without PD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses of continuous data were performed, reporting mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The strength of evidence was appraised using the GRADE framework.
RESULTS: Of 389 retrieved records, 10 studies were included, comprising 1726 individuals (573 with PD; 1153 controls). All studies employed a cross-sectional design with a control group and exhibited a moderate risk of bias. Meta-analyses revealed no significant differences in the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index (k = 5) (MD = -0.30; 95% CI = -5.18-4.57) or untreated dental caries (k = 4) (MD = 0.73; 95% CI = -1.66-3.12). The strength of evidence was classified as low.
CONCLUSION: To date, very-low-certainty evidence does not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in dental caries experience between older adults with and without PD. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and should not be taken as evidence that PD is unrelated to current or future dental caries susceptibility.
METHODS: Seven electronic databases and gray literature sources were systematically searched for observational studies comparing dental caries between individuals with and without PD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses of continuous data were performed, reporting mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The strength of evidence was appraised using the GRADE framework.
RESULTS: Of 389 retrieved records, 10 studies were included, comprising 1726 individuals (573 with PD; 1153 controls). All studies employed a cross-sectional design with a control group and exhibited a moderate risk of bias. Meta-analyses revealed no significant differences in the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index (k = 5) (MD = -0.30; 95% CI = -5.18-4.57) or untreated dental caries (k = 4) (MD = 0.73; 95% CI = -1.66-3.12). The strength of evidence was classified as low.
CONCLUSION: To date, very-low-certainty evidence does not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in dental caries experience between older adults with and without PD. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and should not be taken as evidence that PD is unrelated to current or future dental caries susceptibility.