MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.003

Медицинская библиотека · Comprehensive psychiatry · 2014

Revisiting the concept of late catatonia.

Kocha Hiroki, Moriguchi Sho, Mimura Masaru

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The objective of this paper is to introduce the concept of late catatonia to foreign readers for the first time in English.

METHODS

The original study was conducted about 20 years ago. The subjects were 16 persons who first visited our institutions between 1990 and 1996. They fulfilled the following criteria: 1) late-onset psychosis, with the initial mental changes occurring after 40 years of age; 2) more than one catatonic symptom observed during the clinical course; 3) a total clinical course lasting more than 2 years; and 4) no evidence of apparent organic brain disease. The medical records of individual patients were retrospectively reviewed to summarize the clinical features of this diagnosis.

RESULTS

The crucial feature was the evolution or longitudinal change in the clinical picture over time, with the clinical course being divided into five stages: stage I (prodromal depression), stage II (anxiety and agitation), stage III (hallucination and delusion), stage IV (catatonia syndrome), and residual state. As for treatment, the effect of psychotropic agents was very limited. The electroconvulsive treatment was the most effective treatment option.

CONCLUSION

Apart from the current diagnostic dichotomy of schizophrenia and mood disorder, the concept of late catatonia is useful in clinical settings and may provide clinically important knowledge.

Для цитирования: Kocha Hiroki, Moriguchi Sho, Mimura Masaru. Revisiting the concept of late catatonia.. Comprehensive psychiatry. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.