International ophthalmology · 2026
Large optical zone transepithelial PRK: refractive and aberration outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaya Ünsal Sultan, Özkan Orkun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess refractive outcomes and corneal higher-order aberration changes following transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) performed with large optical zones.
METHODS: Data from 222 eyes of 112 myopic patients undergoing single-step TPRK with Smart Pulse Technology were reviewed retrospectively. Eyes were classified according to programmed optical zone diameter into large optical zone (LOZ, 6.6-7.0 mm; n = 57) and extra-large optical zone (XLOZ, 7.1-7.5 mm; n = 165) groups. Refractive results, safety and efficacy indices, and corneal wavefront aberrations were assessed at the 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Refractive accuracy was high, with 81.1% of eyes within ± 0.50 D and 98.2% within ± 1.00 D of target refraction at 6 months. Safety and efficacy were comparable between the LOZ and XLOZ groups, and no clinically significant haze was observed. Corneal higher-order aberrations increased more in the LOZ group, whereas smaller changes and a slight reduction in coma were observed in the XLOZ group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: TPRK performed with large optical zones demonstrated excellent refractive predictability, safety, and efficacy. The use of extra-large optical zones was associated with smaller increases in corneal higher-order aberrations, suggesting that larger optical zones may help preserve postoperative optical quality after TPRK.
METHODS: Data from 222 eyes of 112 myopic patients undergoing single-step TPRK with Smart Pulse Technology were reviewed retrospectively. Eyes were classified according to programmed optical zone diameter into large optical zone (LOZ, 6.6-7.0 mm; n = 57) and extra-large optical zone (XLOZ, 7.1-7.5 mm; n = 165) groups. Refractive results, safety and efficacy indices, and corneal wavefront aberrations were assessed at the 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Refractive accuracy was high, with 81.1% of eyes within ± 0.50 D and 98.2% within ± 1.00 D of target refraction at 6 months. Safety and efficacy were comparable between the LOZ and XLOZ groups, and no clinically significant haze was observed. Corneal higher-order aberrations increased more in the LOZ group, whereas smaller changes and a slight reduction in coma were observed in the XLOZ group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: TPRK performed with large optical zones demonstrated excellent refractive predictability, safety, and efficacy. The use of extra-large optical zones was associated with smaller increases in corneal higher-order aberrations, suggesting that larger optical zones may help preserve postoperative optical quality after TPRK.