MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12659/ajcr.883248

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of case reports · 2012

Systemic lupus erythematosus with a non functioning pituitary macroadenoma.

Nadira Ummi, Cader Rizna Abdul, Kong Norella C T, Mohd Rozita, Gafor Halim A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Malignancies are more common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) than the general population. SLE patients are recognized to have higher prolactin levels. However, there are very few reported cases of SLE with pituitary adenomas.

CASE REPORT: We report the second case of a pituitary adenoma in a patient with underlying SLE. A 51 year old lady presented with blurred vision and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated a pituitary macroadenoma with mildly elevated serum prolactin levels. The diagnosis of a non functioning pituitary macroadenoma was confirmed histologically. The diagnosis of SLE was made on the basis of thrombocytopenia, antinuclear antibodies, anti double stranded DNA antibodies and lupus nephritis (confirmed on renal biopsy). The patient initially received medical therapy with carbegoline, followed by transsphenoidal neurosurgery for the pituitary macroadenoma. SLE with lupus nephritis was treated with steroids and low dose intravenous cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperprolactinaemia is prevalent in twenty to thirty percent of SLE patients but it is rarely due to a prolactinoma. The source of excessive circulating prolactin in SLE patients has not been fully determined.

Для цитирования: Nadira Ummi, Cader Rizna Abdul, Kong Norella C T, Mohd Rozita, Gafor Halim A. Systemic lupus erythematosus with a non functioning pituitary macroadenoma.. The American journal of case reports. 2012. DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.883248.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.