Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2021
Assessment of Red Cell Distribution Width, Platelet/lymphocyte Ratio, Systemic Immune-inflammation Index, and Neutrophil/lymphocyte Ratio Values in Patients with Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elbeyli Ahmet, Kurtul Bengi Ece, Ozcan Deniz Ozarslan, Ozcan Sait Coskun, Dogan Emine
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate complete blood count (CBC)-derived inflammatory indices in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).
METHODS: A total of 42 patients with CRAO (CRAO group) and 42 age- and sex-matched subjects without CRAO (Control group) were included. CBC parameters including red cell distribution width (RDW) levels were assayed. Platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were calculated.
RESULTS: RDW, PLR, SII and NLR values were significantly higher in CRAO group than control group [15.2 ± 1.47% vs 13.96 ± 1.13% (p < .001), 127.94 ± 48.21 vs 101.16 ± 24.84 (p = .008), 667.11 ± 357.84 vs 493.44 ± 207.07 (p = .008), 2.70 ± 1.27 vs 2.13 ± 0.83 (p = .018), respectively]. In multivariate analysis only RDW was independent predictor for CRAO (OR 2.317, p < .001). On ROC analysis, area under curve of RDW, PLR, SII, and NLR for CRAO were 0.761, 0.685, 0.622 and 0.618, respectively.
CONCLUSION: RDW seems superior to other inflammatory indices to predict CRAO.
METHODS: A total of 42 patients with CRAO (CRAO group) and 42 age- and sex-matched subjects without CRAO (Control group) were included. CBC parameters including red cell distribution width (RDW) levels were assayed. Platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were calculated.
RESULTS: RDW, PLR, SII and NLR values were significantly higher in CRAO group than control group [15.2 ± 1.47% vs 13.96 ± 1.13% (p < .001), 127.94 ± 48.21 vs 101.16 ± 24.84 (p = .008), 667.11 ± 357.84 vs 493.44 ± 207.07 (p = .008), 2.70 ± 1.27 vs 2.13 ± 0.83 (p = .018), respectively]. In multivariate analysis only RDW was independent predictor for CRAO (OR 2.317, p < .001). On ROC analysis, area under curve of RDW, PLR, SII, and NLR for CRAO were 0.761, 0.685, 0.622 and 0.618, respectively.
CONCLUSION: RDW seems superior to other inflammatory indices to predict CRAO.