European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
A systematic review on oncological outcomes, functional results, and laryngeal preservation in vertical partial laryngectomies vs. transoral laser microsurgery for early stage glottic cancer.
СтатьяСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bassani Sara, Dedivitis Rogerio Aparecido, Molteni Gabriele, Zampieri Erica, Dalmazzini Cecilia, de Castro Mario Augusto Ferrari, Kowalski Luiz Paulo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the oncological and functional outcomes of transorallaser microsurgery (TLM) and vertical partial laryngectomy (VPL) in earlystageglottic carcinoma (T1-T2).
METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines analyzedcomparative studies from 2000 to 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web ofScience. Outcomes included local control, recurrence rates, larynxpreservation, survival, voice quality, and complications.
RESULTS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria. TLM and VPL showed comparablesurvival rates for T1 tumors, but VPL provided better local control and larynxpreservation in T2 and anterior commissure involvement cases. TLM had higherrecurrence risk but superior functional outcomes, including better voicepreservation, shorter hospital stays, and lower complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Both techniques are viable, but TLM is preferred for T1 tumors,while VPL should be considered for T2 lesions because of higher local controlrates. Patient priorities and tumor characteristics should guide surgical choice.
METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines analyzedcomparative studies from 2000 to 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web ofScience. Outcomes included local control, recurrence rates, larynxpreservation, survival, voice quality, and complications.
RESULTS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria. TLM and VPL showed comparablesurvival rates for T1 tumors, but VPL provided better local control and larynxpreservation in T2 and anterior commissure involvement cases. TLM had higherrecurrence risk but superior functional outcomes, including better voicepreservation, shorter hospital stays, and lower complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Both techniques are viable, but TLM is preferred for T1 tumors,while VPL should be considered for T2 lesions because of higher local controlrates. Patient priorities and tumor characteristics should guide surgical choice.