Head & face medicine · 2025
Investigation of the effect of impacted third molar position and orientation on bad split fractures in sagittal split ramus osteotomy using finite element analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Üstündağ İrfan, Mecu Erkan, Çetiner Yunus, Şimşek Mehmet Sait
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the impact of different angular orientations and buccolingual positions of impacted third molars on the incidence of bad splits during sagittal split ramus osteotomy using finite element analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 mandibular models were constructed, each representing a unique combination of third molar orientations (vertical, distoangular, horizontal, mesioangular) and positions (buccal, lingual, central). A force of 20 N was applied from the osteotomy line toward the proximal and distal segments to simulate the working principle of the Smith Spreader instrument.
RESULTS: The maximum principal stress followed the order: vertical > distoangular > horizontal > mesioangular. In terms of positional stress distribution, the buccal position generated the highest stress, followed by lingual and central positions. Similar trends were observed across all stress criteria evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The orientation and position of impacted third molars have a direct effect on the risk of bad splits during SSRO. Mesioangular and centrally positioned teeth were associated with lower stress levels, indicating lower risk, while vertically oriented and buccally or lingually positioned molars showed significantly higher stress concentrations. Thus, extraction of high-risk impacted third molars prior to surgery is recommended to reduce the likelihood of complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 mandibular models were constructed, each representing a unique combination of third molar orientations (vertical, distoangular, horizontal, mesioangular) and positions (buccal, lingual, central). A force of 20 N was applied from the osteotomy line toward the proximal and distal segments to simulate the working principle of the Smith Spreader instrument.
RESULTS: The maximum principal stress followed the order: vertical > distoangular > horizontal > mesioangular. In terms of positional stress distribution, the buccal position generated the highest stress, followed by lingual and central positions. Similar trends were observed across all stress criteria evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The orientation and position of impacted third molars have a direct effect on the risk of bad splits during SSRO. Mesioangular and centrally positioned teeth were associated with lower stress levels, indicating lower risk, while vertically oriented and buccally or lingually positioned molars showed significantly higher stress concentrations. Thus, extraction of high-risk impacted third molars prior to surgery is recommended to reduce the likelihood of complications.