Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026
The exploration and research on the establishment of an early risk assessment system for high-risk diabetic feet.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qi Haixia, Li Juan, Hou Lijie, Huang Ruiping, Ma Lihua
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To develop an early risk assessment system for high-risk diabetic feet.
METHODS: The system framework was established through literature review and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation.
RESULTS: The two rounds of consultation achieved effective response rates of 73.3% and 100.0%, with authority coefficients of 0.802 and 0.933, and Kendall's coefficients of concordance (W) of 0.302 and 0.103 (all P < 0.05). Consensus was reached on an early risk assessment system comprising 6 dimensions (risk factor identification, neurological assessment, vascular evaluation, foot skin and nail examination, self-care ability assessment, and healthcare resource accessibility) and 42 items, enabling structured risk stratification for high-risk diabetic feet.
CONCLUSION: The Delphi-validated system demonstrates good scientific rigor, rationality, practicality, and targetedness. This evidence-based tool can guide nursing training, standardize prevention and control practices, refine teaching programs, and evaluate institutional capabilities for high-risk diabetic foot management.
METHODS: The system framework was established through literature review and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation.
RESULTS: The two rounds of consultation achieved effective response rates of 73.3% and 100.0%, with authority coefficients of 0.802 and 0.933, and Kendall's coefficients of concordance (W) of 0.302 and 0.103 (all P < 0.05). Consensus was reached on an early risk assessment system comprising 6 dimensions (risk factor identification, neurological assessment, vascular evaluation, foot skin and nail examination, self-care ability assessment, and healthcare resource accessibility) and 42 items, enabling structured risk stratification for high-risk diabetic feet.
CONCLUSION: The Delphi-validated system demonstrates good scientific rigor, rationality, practicality, and targetedness. This evidence-based tool can guide nursing training, standardize prevention and control practices, refine teaching programs, and evaluate institutional capabilities for high-risk diabetic foot management.