International journal of cardiology · 2024
Exploring hemodynamic mechanisms and re-intervention strategies for partial false lumen thrombosis in Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic aortic endovascular repair.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Jian, Chen Bing, Gao Fan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: False lumen (FL) thrombosis status for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is critical for evaluating aortic remodeling and long-term prognosis. This study aimed to monitor the morphology evolution of partial FL thrombosis (PFLT) and its hemodynamic conditions through an innovative approach, providing a re-intervention strategy from both morphologic and hemodynamic perspectives.
METHODS: Three-dimensional geometries are extracted from a five-year follow-up of CTA images for TBAD after TEVAR. The morphology and hemodynamics of PFLT are comprehensively analyzed based on patient-specific reconstructions and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The impact of various strategies treating risk factors of PFLT, including proximal entry closure, left renal artery stenting, or accessory renal artery embolism on hemodynamics is assessed.
RESULTS: The introduced morphologic approaches appropriately reflected the evolution of PFLT. Gradual dilation of FL (surface area from 82.63cm2 to 98.84cm2, volume from 45.12 mL to 63.40 mL, increase in distal tear (from 3.72 cm to 4.32 cm), and fluctuation of thrombosis-blood lumen boundary are observed. For further surgical preparation in the absence of unanimously recognized re-intervention indicators, velocity and wall shear stress distributions reveal different simulated re-interventions have distinctly suppressive effects on hemodynamic conditions within the PFLT, providing valuable insights for further surgical preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a re-intervention strategy for PFLT in TBAD patients after TEVAR utilizing morphologic and hemodynamic analyses. Acknowledging the deterioration of PFLT may result in adverse long-term outcomes, this strategy might offer an alternative approach for clinical monitoring and management of related patients.
METHODS: Three-dimensional geometries are extracted from a five-year follow-up of CTA images for TBAD after TEVAR. The morphology and hemodynamics of PFLT are comprehensively analyzed based on patient-specific reconstructions and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The impact of various strategies treating risk factors of PFLT, including proximal entry closure, left renal artery stenting, or accessory renal artery embolism on hemodynamics is assessed.
RESULTS: The introduced morphologic approaches appropriately reflected the evolution of PFLT. Gradual dilation of FL (surface area from 82.63cm2 to 98.84cm2, volume from 45.12 mL to 63.40 mL, increase in distal tear (from 3.72 cm to 4.32 cm), and fluctuation of thrombosis-blood lumen boundary are observed. For further surgical preparation in the absence of unanimously recognized re-intervention indicators, velocity and wall shear stress distributions reveal different simulated re-interventions have distinctly suppressive effects on hemodynamic conditions within the PFLT, providing valuable insights for further surgical preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a re-intervention strategy for PFLT in TBAD patients after TEVAR utilizing morphologic and hemodynamic analyses. Acknowledging the deterioration of PFLT may result in adverse long-term outcomes, this strategy might offer an alternative approach for clinical monitoring and management of related patients.