Asian journal of psychiatry · 2026
Toward precision psychiatry in catatonia: A scoping review of its factor structure and clinical implications.
Scoping ReviewСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Flores-Cohaila Javier A, Huarcaya-Victoria Jeff
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Catatonia is a complex, heterogeneous syndrome that challenges current diagnostic boundaries. While recent studies consistently propose a three-factor structure, no systematic synthesis has comprehensively mapped these dimensions to their clinical correlates. Therefore, a scoping review was performed to analyze the factor-analytic evidence and propose a framework for precision psychiatry in catatonia.
METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in adherence to JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched until September 2025 for studies in which catatonia factor structure was estimated through any statistical method.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified, with participants ranging from 34 to 1456. Studies consistently supported the three-factor model: (1) Hypokinetic (inhibitory/oppositional), associated with depression, negative symptoms, male sex, and favorable lorazepam response; (2) Hyperkinetic (excitement/impulsivity), linked to mania and psychosis; and (3) Parakinetic (odd/iterative/volitional), associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and treatment resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study support the three-factor model structure of catatonia, and propose sub-factors with specific correlations. This supports a move toward precision psychiatry, where motor profiling may guide therapeutic selection more effectively than categorical diagnosis alone.
METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in adherence to JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched until September 2025 for studies in which catatonia factor structure was estimated through any statistical method.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified, with participants ranging from 34 to 1456. Studies consistently supported the three-factor model: (1) Hypokinetic (inhibitory/oppositional), associated with depression, negative symptoms, male sex, and favorable lorazepam response; (2) Hyperkinetic (excitement/impulsivity), linked to mania and psychosis; and (3) Parakinetic (odd/iterative/volitional), associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and treatment resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study support the three-factor model structure of catatonia, and propose sub-factors with specific correlations. This supports a move toward precision psychiatry, where motor profiling may guide therapeutic selection more effectively than categorical diagnosis alone.