Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Analytical Agreement of the GeneXpert HIV-1 Viral Load Assay Compared with the Abbott Alinity m HIV-1 Assay.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alhazmi Khulud A, Bani AbdelRahman Sulaiman, Altarawneh Hala, Ibrahem Karem, Halabi Waiel S, Alsaedi Abdulaziz, Asiri Turki, Saleh Bandar Hasan, Mufrrih Mohammed, Alharbi Ahmad M, Shrwani Khalid J, Alsafi Radi, Aljuaid Abdulelah, Alzain Mohannad A, Alqarni Mona Abdulrahman, Faqerah Nojoud, Altalhi Rawan, Niyazi Hatoon A, Juma Noha A, Daffa Noura, Sindi Nariman, Alhazmi Wafaa, Azhari Ala A, Jawa Basem A
Аннотация
Background/Objectives: Early and accurate quantification of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) viral load is essential for monitoring antiretroviral therapy and guiding clinical management. Although conventional real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) platforms provide reliable viral load measurement, they often require centralized laboratories and longer turnaround times. Cartridge-based systems such as the GeneXpert HIV-1 Viral Load assay offer a simplified testing workflow and may facilitate decentralized molecular testing. This study aimed to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative agreement between the GeneXpert HIV-1 Viral Load assay and the Abbott Alinity m HIV-1 assay. Methods: A total of 102 residual clinical Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma specimens were analyzed using both the GeneXpert HIV-1 Viral Load assay and the Abbott Alinity m HIV-1 assay. Qualitative agreement was evaluated using positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), overall agreement, and Cohen's κ coefficient. Quantitative agreement among specimens with paired quantifiable viral load results was assessed using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Overall qualitative agreement between the two assays was 95.1%, with a PPA of 92.6%, an NPA of 100.0%, and a Cohen's κ coefficient of 0.894, indicating almost perfect agreement. Among the 57 specimens with paired quantifiable viral load results, a very strong positive correlation was observed (Pearson's r = 0.9972; 95% CI: 0.9952-0.9984; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a minimal mean bias of -0.018 log10 IU/mL, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -0.175 to 0.139 log10 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL). All paired quantitative differences were within the clinically accepted agreement threshold of ±0.5 log10 IU/mL. Conclusions: The GeneXpert HIV-1 Viral Load assay demonstrated excellent qualitative and quantitative agreement with the Abbott Alinity m HIV-1 assay. These findings support the potential use of the GeneXpert HIV-1 Viral Load assay as an alternative testing platform for routine HIV-1 viral load monitoring in appropriate clinical settings.