Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025
Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), arterial stiffness, and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in a population-based study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Strömberg Susanna, Stomby Andreas, Engvall Jan, Östgren Carl Johan
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate the association between Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and subclinical damage in two vascular beds: atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries and aortic arterial stiffness, in a large population-based cohort without cardiovascular disease or diabetes.
METHODS: Design: A cross-sectional study based on Swedish CArdio Pulmonary bioImaging Study (SCAPIS) data. Study population: A population-based cohort of 3087 participants aged 50-64.
OUTCOME: Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) was measured, and aortic arterial stiffness was defined as PWV≥ 10 m/s. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was determined by coronary computed tomography and clinically significant coronary calcification was defined as CACS > 100.
RESULTS: The prevalence of arterial stiffness was 6.6% in the low-moderate SCORE2 risk group, 31.0% in the high-risk group, and 53.3% in the very high-risk group. The prevalence of coronary calcification was 4.5%, 18.5% 23.0%, respectively. There was a modest overlap between arterial stiffness and coronary calcification in all SCORE2 risk groups. When comparing the high SCORE2 risk group with the low-moderate risk group, the Odds ratio (OR) was 6.4, 95% confidence interval (CI 5.1-8.0) for arterial stiffness and 4.8 (CI 3.7-6.3) for coronary calcification. When comparing the very high SCORE2 risk group to the low-moderate group, the OR was 16.2 (CI 11.3-23.1) for arterial stiffness and 6.4 (CI 4.2-9.7) for coronary calcification.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that high cardiovascular risk according to SCORE2 is associated with increased arterial stiffness and significant coronary calcification in a population without prevalent cardiovascular disease or diabetes. This knowledge can be useful in primary care, where SCORE2 is frequently used as a risk prediction tool. The modest overlap between arterial stiffness and coronary calcification suggests that CACS and PWV describe different types of vascular damage.
METHODS: Design: A cross-sectional study based on Swedish CArdio Pulmonary bioImaging Study (SCAPIS) data. Study population: A population-based cohort of 3087 participants aged 50-64.
OUTCOME: Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) was measured, and aortic arterial stiffness was defined as PWV≥ 10 m/s. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was determined by coronary computed tomography and clinically significant coronary calcification was defined as CACS > 100.
RESULTS: The prevalence of arterial stiffness was 6.6% in the low-moderate SCORE2 risk group, 31.0% in the high-risk group, and 53.3% in the very high-risk group. The prevalence of coronary calcification was 4.5%, 18.5% 23.0%, respectively. There was a modest overlap between arterial stiffness and coronary calcification in all SCORE2 risk groups. When comparing the high SCORE2 risk group with the low-moderate risk group, the Odds ratio (OR) was 6.4, 95% confidence interval (CI 5.1-8.0) for arterial stiffness and 4.8 (CI 3.7-6.3) for coronary calcification. When comparing the very high SCORE2 risk group to the low-moderate group, the OR was 16.2 (CI 11.3-23.1) for arterial stiffness and 6.4 (CI 4.2-9.7) for coronary calcification.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that high cardiovascular risk according to SCORE2 is associated with increased arterial stiffness and significant coronary calcification in a population without prevalent cardiovascular disease or diabetes. This knowledge can be useful in primary care, where SCORE2 is frequently used as a risk prediction tool. The modest overlap between arterial stiffness and coronary calcification suggests that CACS and PWV describe different types of vascular damage.