Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
Changes to management influenced by next-generation sequencing of pancreatic duct aspirates among patients with main pancreatic duct dilatation of unclear etiology: a multicenter cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jones Alex R, Kannan Amudhan, Ley Dana, Ramirez Oscar Ramirez, Sheth Megha, Murimwa Gilbert, Abbas Ali, Deverakonda Abhi, Bishop Christofer, Coleman Veronica, Foley Blake, Ellis Daniel, Gopal Deepak, Benson Mark, Stadmeyer Peter, Khatri Gaurav, Zafar Syed Nabeel, Polanco Patricio M, Zeh Herbert, Mansour John, Fleming Jason, Singhi Aatur, Minter Rebecca, Kubiliun Nisa, Pfau Patrick, Sawas Tarek
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation of unclear etiology presents a diagnostic challenge because the management of neoplastic and non-neoplastic causes differs significantly. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the management of MPD dilatation.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with dilated MPD (≥6 mm) of unclear etiology who underwent NGS at 2 academic institutions. The primary outcome was any change to management influenced by NGS compared with previous standard of practice. Adverse event rates of EUS fine-needle aspiration and ERCP were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with dilated MPD were identified; they had a mean age of 71.5 ± 12.1 years, and 53.2% were men. The majority had chronic pancreatitis (54.8%). The average MPD diameter was 8.6 ± 2.3 mm. MPD aspiration was performed by EUS fine-needle aspiration in 33 patients (53.2%) and ERCP in 29 patients (46.8%). The adverse event rate was 8.1%, with no difference between aspiration techniques observed. NGS mutations were present in 40 (64.5%) patients. The identification of mutations suggesting a neoplastic cause of MPD dilatation resulted in surgical management for 11 patients with no previous indication. In 6 cases with MPD ≥10 mm, dilatation was attributed to chronic pancreatitis and surgery was deferred despite previous practice of recommending surgery. Overall, management was changed in 17 (27.4%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter cohort of patients with MPD dilatation, NGS of MPD aspirates was safe and changed surgical management for more than one-quarter of patients. Providers should consider MPD sampling with NGS as an ancillary diagnostic modality for patients presenting with MPD dilatation of unclear etiology.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with dilated MPD (≥6 mm) of unclear etiology who underwent NGS at 2 academic institutions. The primary outcome was any change to management influenced by NGS compared with previous standard of practice. Adverse event rates of EUS fine-needle aspiration and ERCP were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with dilated MPD were identified; they had a mean age of 71.5 ± 12.1 years, and 53.2% were men. The majority had chronic pancreatitis (54.8%). The average MPD diameter was 8.6 ± 2.3 mm. MPD aspiration was performed by EUS fine-needle aspiration in 33 patients (53.2%) and ERCP in 29 patients (46.8%). The adverse event rate was 8.1%, with no difference between aspiration techniques observed. NGS mutations were present in 40 (64.5%) patients. The identification of mutations suggesting a neoplastic cause of MPD dilatation resulted in surgical management for 11 patients with no previous indication. In 6 cases with MPD ≥10 mm, dilatation was attributed to chronic pancreatitis and surgery was deferred despite previous practice of recommending surgery. Overall, management was changed in 17 (27.4%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter cohort of patients with MPD dilatation, NGS of MPD aspirates was safe and changed surgical management for more than one-quarter of patients. Providers should consider MPD sampling with NGS as an ancillary diagnostic modality for patients presenting with MPD dilatation of unclear etiology.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansMaleFemaleAgedRetrospective StudiesDilatation, PathologicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePancreatic DuctsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationMiddle AgedPancreatitis, ChronicAged, 80 and overPancreatic NeoplasmsMutationPancreatic Diseases