MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00259-026-08005-y

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026

Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging.

Constantino Cláudia Santos, Oliveira Carla, Oliveira Francisco P M, Moreira Inês, DeCensi Andrea, Vinga Susana, Costa Durval C

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate a deep-learning (DL)-based framework to automatically perform breast cancer (BC) metabolic staging on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT, and to assess agreement among DL-based, nuclear medicine (NM) physician-based, and clinical staging.

METHODS

A total of 403 histologically confirmed BC patients who underwent whole-body staging [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT were retrospectively included. All [18F]FDG avid lesions suspected of malignancy were segmented by an NM physician and classified into four key tumor regions: primary tumor (pT), regional axillary lymph nodes (ALN), extra-axillary locoregional nodes (extra-ALN), and distant metastases (dM). Data were split into training (n = 303) and testing (n = 100) sets using a stratified approach. Class-specific DL segmentation networks were developed. A post-processing pipeline was implemented to derive metabolic TNM staging from the DL-based segmentation. Using NM-based and clinical staging segmentation as reference, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for T, N, and M. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DC) and lesion detection (LD) metrics. NM-based metabolic staging was also compared with clinical staging.

RESULTS

DL-based staging showed concordance with NM-based/clinical staging of 75/62%, 87/74%, and 83/82% for T, N, and M, respectively. For N3 (presence of extra-ALN) and M1 (presence of dM), where [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is particularly relevant, sensitivity/specificity of DL-based (NM-based reference) were 0.86/0.96, and 0.97/0.78, respectively. Segmentation performance was good to excellent for pT, ALN, and dM (median DC ≥ 0.83 and LD ≥ 0.78), and moderate for extra-ALN (median DC = 0.63 and LD ≥ 0.71). NM-based metabolic staging agreed with clinical staging in 63%, 80%, and 99% of cases for T, N, and M, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although expert supervision remains essential, the developed DL-based framework demonstrates potential as a supportive tool for metabolic staging in BC patients, facilitating a workflow-efficient [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT-based staging assessment.

Для цитирования: Constantino Cláudia Santos, Oliveira Carla, Oliveira Francisco P M, Moreira Inês, DeCensi Andrea, Vinga Susana, Costa Durval C. Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging.. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-026-08005-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.