International journal of colorectal disease · 2026
Transverse blowhole colostomy versus Hartmann's for urgent management of large bowel obstruction secondary to diverticular stricture.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liefeld Hannah R, Coleman Kristen L, Lawrence Kelsey, Ogilvie James W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Sigmoid resection with end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) is the procedure of choice when a large bowel obstruction secondary to diverticular disease requires surgery. Less morbid alternatives are less common. This study compares a transverse blowhole colostomy as a first-stage intervention in diverticular-associated obstruction. Our primary aim was to compare colostomy reversal rates and postoperative outcomes between blowhole colostomy and Hartmann's procedure.
METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. An institutional database was utilized to retrospectively identify adult patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure or blowhole colostomy for diverticular strictures with obstruction between 2012 and 2023.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent Hartmann's procedure for diverticular strictures with obstruction and 15 patients underwent blowhole colostomy. The blowhole colostomy group had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (median 5 vs. 8 days, p = 0.01). Colostomy reversal was more frequent in the blowhole group (81.3% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.08), with a shorter median time to reversal (3 months vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.01). A significant increase in reversals performed using a minimally invasive approach (84.6% vs. 50%, p < 0.01) occurred in the blowhole colostomy group. No significant differences were observed in other postoperative outcomes, including proximal diversion after colostomy reversal.
CONCLUSIONS: Blowhole colostomy may be a viable alternative to a Hartmann's procedure for diverticular-associated large bowel obstruction, offering potential benefits such as shorter hospital stays, higher rates of colostomy reversal, and a greater likelihood of minimally invasive reversal. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. An institutional database was utilized to retrospectively identify adult patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure or blowhole colostomy for diverticular strictures with obstruction between 2012 and 2023.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent Hartmann's procedure for diverticular strictures with obstruction and 15 patients underwent blowhole colostomy. The blowhole colostomy group had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (median 5 vs. 8 days, p = 0.01). Colostomy reversal was more frequent in the blowhole group (81.3% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.08), with a shorter median time to reversal (3 months vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.01). A significant increase in reversals performed using a minimally invasive approach (84.6% vs. 50%, p < 0.01) occurred in the blowhole colostomy group. No significant differences were observed in other postoperative outcomes, including proximal diversion after colostomy reversal.
CONCLUSIONS: Blowhole colostomy may be a viable alternative to a Hartmann's procedure for diverticular-associated large bowel obstruction, offering potential benefits such as shorter hospital stays, higher rates of colostomy reversal, and a greater likelihood of minimally invasive reversal. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.