MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.028

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of emergency medicine · 2025

Research progress of cervicocerebral artery dissection, from mechanism to clinic: A scoping review.

Cheng Hui, Pan Bingcheng, Li Huanjie, Xiaofeng Li, Zhong Dayuan, He Jianfeng

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cervicocerebral artery dissection (CAD) commonly occurs in young individuals, and its clinical manifestations lack specificity. It can present as either ischemic or hemorrhagic events. Due to variations in the location, timing of formation, and severity of the lesion in CAD, clinical presentations vary widely, making imaging crucial for accurate diagnosis. Currently, the primary treatment for CAD focuses on anti-thrombotic therapy, and evidence supporting venous thrombolysis is still inconclusive. With advancements in scientific technology, the concepts of the etiology and surgical treatment of CAD continue to evolve over time. As of now, the literature on CAD has experienced an exponential growth in the number of articles. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive discussion on the latest perspectives regarding the pathogenic mechanisms and treatment approaches for CAD. This study combines discussions on the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, auxiliary examinations, and treatment of CAD, aiming to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of CAD.

Для цитирования: Cheng Hui, Pan Bingcheng, Li Huanjie, Xiaofeng Li, Zhong Dayuan, He Jianfeng. Research progress of cervicocerebral artery dissection, from mechanism to clinic: A scoping review.. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.028.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.