Journal of the neurological sciences · 2024
Tissue plasminogen activator for acute branch atheromatous disease exhibits transient improvement and worsening.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kobayashi Yuya, Kondo Yasufumi, Yamamoto Kanji, Hirayama Shuichi, Kuasano Yoshikazu, Tazawa Ko-Ichi, Shimizu Yusaku, Sato Atsushi, Sekijima Yoshiki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Although initial improvement is observed when administered for branch atheromatous disease (BAD), some cases subsequently worsen. Clinical data on the characteristics of these patients is lacking, and the benefits of tPA are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze rebound cases and elucidate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with tPA administration in BAD.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in Japan. Worsening after initial improvement of a condition is termed as rebound, and such cases were compared with other types of ischemic stroke in patients with and without rebound. The characteristics of patients with BAD who rebounded were examined.
RESULTS: The study included 93 patients. Among the patients who were administered tPA, the NIHSS scores at 24 h and 7 days post-tPA were significantly higher in patients with BAD than in patients with other types of infarcts. The group with BAD exhibited a significantly higher rate of rebound than other groups (37.5 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.001). However, no differences were observed in outcomes between patients who experienced rebound after tPA administration and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Reevaluation and changing the strategy of tPA use in patients with BAD may be necessary. However, this study does not totally discourage its use, as specific patients can benefit.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze rebound cases and elucidate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with tPA administration in BAD.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in Japan. Worsening after initial improvement of a condition is termed as rebound, and such cases were compared with other types of ischemic stroke in patients with and without rebound. The characteristics of patients with BAD who rebounded were examined.
RESULTS: The study included 93 patients. Among the patients who were administered tPA, the NIHSS scores at 24 h and 7 days post-tPA were significantly higher in patients with BAD than in patients with other types of infarcts. The group with BAD exhibited a significantly higher rate of rebound than other groups (37.5 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.001). However, no differences were observed in outcomes between patients who experienced rebound after tPA administration and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Reevaluation and changing the strategy of tPA use in patients with BAD may be necessary. However, this study does not totally discourage its use, as specific patients can benefit.