Brachytherapy · 2023
A practical guide to hybrid interstitial/intracavitary brachytherapy for locally-advanced cervical cancer.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ladbury Colton, Harkenrider Matthew, Taunk Neil, Fisher Christine, Mayadev Jyoti, Venkat Puja, Yashar Catheryn, Gaffney David, Beriwal Sushil, Glaser Scott
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In select cases of locally advanced cervical cancer, a hybrid brachytherapy (HBT) approach consisting of a combined intracavitary (IC)/insterstitial (IS) implant can yield improved target coverage and/or decreased organ at risk dose compared to IC techniques while limiting invasiveness compared to IS techniques.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The technique involves placement of transvaginal and/or perineal needles in addition to the tandem and ring/ovoids using either a specialized applicator or free-hand placement. Following applicator and needle placement, brachytherapy may then be planned using principles similar to IC or IS techniques. During treatment planning, it can be helpful to obtain both MRI and CT imaging, as plastic MRI-compatible needles do not show up well on MRI.
RESULTS: In patients where acceptable target coverage cannot be achieved using IC alone or doses to nearby OAR are too high, HBT should be evaluated. HBT can improve both dose to target and OAR while sparing patients the morbidity of perineal template-based interstitial brachytherapy. Specific scenarios where HBT may be preferred include bulky residual primary tumor especially with poor response to EBRT, extension into the lateral parametrium, vaginal extension of tumor, and an asymmetric target. Use of HBT can typically permit extension of dose coverage by an additional 1-2 cm beyond what can be achieved with an IC alone technique.
CONCLUSION: HBT allows for improved therapeutic ratio by improving target volume coverage and/or lowering doses to OARs. Brachytherapists should be trained on the practical aspects of administering HBT to be able to offer a less invasive and impactful treatment option when appropriate.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The technique involves placement of transvaginal and/or perineal needles in addition to the tandem and ring/ovoids using either a specialized applicator or free-hand placement. Following applicator and needle placement, brachytherapy may then be planned using principles similar to IC or IS techniques. During treatment planning, it can be helpful to obtain both MRI and CT imaging, as plastic MRI-compatible needles do not show up well on MRI.
RESULTS: In patients where acceptable target coverage cannot be achieved using IC alone or doses to nearby OAR are too high, HBT should be evaluated. HBT can improve both dose to target and OAR while sparing patients the morbidity of perineal template-based interstitial brachytherapy. Specific scenarios where HBT may be preferred include bulky residual primary tumor especially with poor response to EBRT, extension into the lateral parametrium, vaginal extension of tumor, and an asymmetric target. Use of HBT can typically permit extension of dose coverage by an additional 1-2 cm beyond what can be achieved with an IC alone technique.
CONCLUSION: HBT allows for improved therapeutic ratio by improving target volume coverage and/or lowering doses to OARs. Brachytherapists should be trained on the practical aspects of administering HBT to be able to offer a less invasive and impactful treatment option when appropriate.