European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
Endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy: Reasons for failure and possible solutions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gupta Nishi, Arora Rubeena, Goyal Aashish
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is a well-established procedure with high success rate. There are multiple causes of failure of this procedure which affect surgical success.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze causes of failure in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and ascertain methods to overcome causes of failure.
METHODS: After approval from the Institutional Review Board a retrospective review of 119 patients was undertaken over an 11-year period from 2008 to 2018.
SETTING: A tertiary care hospital in North India.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients presenting to the Otorhinolaryngology out-patient department and diagnosed as failed endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy cases.
INTERVENTION: After thorough preoperative workup consisting of history, examination and diagnostic nasal endoscopy, patients underwent revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.
RESULTS: After exclusion of 2 cases, 117 patients were included in the study. The mean age at presentation was 31.4 years. Number of previous surgeries: 92 patients had had one surgery, 20 patients had had two surgeries, 5 patients had had three surgeries and 9 patients had had multiple surgeries before presentation. All patients (100%) had epiphora, 75 (64.1%) patients had associated discharge and 4 (3.4%) had persistent medial canthal swelling. Duration of symptoms following previous surgery was 1-6 weeks. Commonest cause of failure was incomplete sac exposure in 117/117 cases (100%). Other causes were cicatricial closure of ostium in 47 (40.1%), synechiae in 20 (17%), canalicular obstruction in 4(3.4%), lacrimal sac diverticulum in 3 (2.5%), nasal polyps in 2 (1.7%), concha with adhesion in 2 (1.7%), septal deviation in 2 (1.7%) cases.
CONCLUSION: Meticulous and thorough sac exposure is the most important factor affecting surgical success. Comprehensive preoperative assessment of cases, meticulous surgical technique, and postoperative follow up are needed for successful outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze causes of failure in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and ascertain methods to overcome causes of failure.
METHODS: After approval from the Institutional Review Board a retrospective review of 119 patients was undertaken over an 11-year period from 2008 to 2018.
SETTING: A tertiary care hospital in North India.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients presenting to the Otorhinolaryngology out-patient department and diagnosed as failed endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy cases.
INTERVENTION: After thorough preoperative workup consisting of history, examination and diagnostic nasal endoscopy, patients underwent revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.
RESULTS: After exclusion of 2 cases, 117 patients were included in the study. The mean age at presentation was 31.4 years. Number of previous surgeries: 92 patients had had one surgery, 20 patients had had two surgeries, 5 patients had had three surgeries and 9 patients had had multiple surgeries before presentation. All patients (100%) had epiphora, 75 (64.1%) patients had associated discharge and 4 (3.4%) had persistent medial canthal swelling. Duration of symptoms following previous surgery was 1-6 weeks. Commonest cause of failure was incomplete sac exposure in 117/117 cases (100%). Other causes were cicatricial closure of ostium in 47 (40.1%), synechiae in 20 (17%), canalicular obstruction in 4(3.4%), lacrimal sac diverticulum in 3 (2.5%), nasal polyps in 2 (1.7%), concha with adhesion in 2 (1.7%), septal deviation in 2 (1.7%) cases.
CONCLUSION: Meticulous and thorough sac exposure is the most important factor affecting surgical success. Comprehensive preoperative assessment of cases, meticulous surgical technique, and postoperative follow up are needed for successful outcomes.