European radiology · 2025
Development and multicentric validation of GRAVITS (GRavity of Venous Insufficiency in post-Thrombotic Syndrome scoring): a novel imaging scoring system for post-thrombotic syndrome. A study by the French Society of Cardiovascular Imaging.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hans Hugo, Thouveny Francine, Douane Frederic, Monnin-Bares Valerie, Barraud Lucas, Veunac Louis, Bouvier Antoine, Martinelli Thomas, Le Pennec Vincent, Rodiere Mathieu, Loffroy Romaric, Le Bras Yann, Crombé Amandine, Marcelin Clément
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: A standardized grading system for venous post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in cross-sectional imaging is lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate GRAVITS (GRavity of Venous Insufficiency in post-Thrombotic Syndrome scoring), a novel MRI-Venography/CT-Venography-based scoring system for venous obstruction, using a Delphi consensus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Delphi consensus involved a survey distributed to 22 experts from the French Society of Cardiovascular Imaging. Data was reviewed and discussed in a consensus meeting, where a structured voting process established the GRAVITS system. A retrospective cohort of 40 PTS patients from three centers was analyzed. Twelve venous imaging specialists evaluated venous sequelae in axial MRV/CTV slices using GRAVITS. Inter-observer reproducibility was measured using Krippendorff's alpha (α) and tested across vein types, imaging types, and vein pathological reference status. Intra-observer reproducibility was measured using weighted Kappa (κw). Correlations between GRAVITS scores and clinical scores (Villalta, CIVIQ-20) were assessed using Spearman tests.
RESULTS: GRAVITS, defined as an ordinal score with four levels ("A: normal vein" to "D: totally occluded vein"), was evaluated in 851 venous segments (40 patients, median age 43.4, 55% women). Inter-observer reproducibility was substantial (α = 0.607), with the highest reproducibility for the external iliac vein (α = 0.693) and the lowest for the popliteal veins (α = 0.364). TrueFISP and BFFE had the highest reproducibility (α = 0.679), while direct CTV was lower (αK = 0.548). κw for two radiologists was calculated using a random sample of 168 venous segments, yielding values of 0.777 and 0.882 (both p < 0.0001). Average GRAVITS scores were significantly correlated with CIVIQ-20 (rho = 0.515, p = 0.0042).
CONCLUSION: GRAVITS demonstrated substantial reproducibility and significant correlation with CIVIQ-20, supporting its potential as a reliable tool for grading venous sequelae in PTS. Further validation is warranted to refine its clinical utility.
KEY POINTS: Question GRAVITS (GRavity of Venous Insufficiency in post-Thrombotic Syndrome scoring) is a novel MRI/CT-based scoring system developed via Delphi consensus to standardize the assessment of venous obstruction in post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) patients. Findings The GRAVITS score demonstrated high inter-observer reproducibility, particularly in assessing the external iliac vein, with the best results obtained using MRI TrueFISP and BFFE sequences. Clinical relevance GRAVITS provides a standardized, reproducible scoring system for grading venous obstruction in post-thrombotic syndrome using MRI and CT venography. Its correlation with quality-of-life scores highlights its potential clinical utility in assessing patient impairment and guiding management decisions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Delphi consensus involved a survey distributed to 22 experts from the French Society of Cardiovascular Imaging. Data was reviewed and discussed in a consensus meeting, where a structured voting process established the GRAVITS system. A retrospective cohort of 40 PTS patients from three centers was analyzed. Twelve venous imaging specialists evaluated venous sequelae in axial MRV/CTV slices using GRAVITS. Inter-observer reproducibility was measured using Krippendorff's alpha (α) and tested across vein types, imaging types, and vein pathological reference status. Intra-observer reproducibility was measured using weighted Kappa (κw). Correlations between GRAVITS scores and clinical scores (Villalta, CIVIQ-20) were assessed using Spearman tests.
RESULTS: GRAVITS, defined as an ordinal score with four levels ("A: normal vein" to "D: totally occluded vein"), was evaluated in 851 venous segments (40 patients, median age 43.4, 55% women). Inter-observer reproducibility was substantial (α = 0.607), with the highest reproducibility for the external iliac vein (α = 0.693) and the lowest for the popliteal veins (α = 0.364). TrueFISP and BFFE had the highest reproducibility (α = 0.679), while direct CTV was lower (αK = 0.548). κw for two radiologists was calculated using a random sample of 168 venous segments, yielding values of 0.777 and 0.882 (both p < 0.0001). Average GRAVITS scores were significantly correlated with CIVIQ-20 (rho = 0.515, p = 0.0042).
CONCLUSION: GRAVITS demonstrated substantial reproducibility and significant correlation with CIVIQ-20, supporting its potential as a reliable tool for grading venous sequelae in PTS. Further validation is warranted to refine its clinical utility.
KEY POINTS: Question GRAVITS (GRavity of Venous Insufficiency in post-Thrombotic Syndrome scoring) is a novel MRI/CT-based scoring system developed via Delphi consensus to standardize the assessment of venous obstruction in post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) patients. Findings The GRAVITS score demonstrated high inter-observer reproducibility, particularly in assessing the external iliac vein, with the best results obtained using MRI TrueFISP and BFFE sequences. Clinical relevance GRAVITS provides a standardized, reproducible scoring system for grading venous obstruction in post-thrombotic syndrome using MRI and CT venography. Its correlation with quality-of-life scores highlights its potential clinical utility in assessing patient impairment and guiding management decisions.