MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2004

Diagnostic significance of carbamazepine and trigger zones in trigeminal neuralgia.

Sato Jun, Saitoh Tohru, Notani Ken-Ichi, Fukuda Hiroshi, Kaneyama Keiseki, Segami Natsuki

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the efficacy of carbamazepine (CBZ) and the presence of the trigger zone for diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Study design CBZ was administered to 61 patients with suspected TN. All patients underwent intracranial examination by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. The final diagnosis was established by oral and maxillofacial surgeon and neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients, 50 were finally diagnosed as having TN and 6 as having atypical facial pain. CBZ was effective for pain relief in 45 of the 50 TN patients (90%), and in 5 of the 11 patients (45%) with other diseases (P <.005). However, CBZ also relieved pain in some patients other than TN. Thirty of the 31 patients (97%) with a distinct trigger zone and 20 of the 30 (67%) without a trigger zone were diagnosed as having TN (P<0.005).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of CBZ is an auxiliary indicator of TN and the presence of a distinct trigger zone is a strong indicator of TN.

Для цитирования: Sato Jun, Saitoh Tohru, Notani Ken-Ichi, Fukuda Hiroshi, Kaneyama Keiseki, Segami Natsuki. Diagnostic significance of carbamazepine and trigger zones in trigeminal neuralgia.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.