MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0974-620x.122272

Медицинская библиотека · Oman journal of ophthalmology · 2013

Magnitude and determinants of refractive error among school children of two districts of Kathmandu, Nepal.

Adhikari Srijana, Nepal Bhagwat P, Shrestha Jeevan Kumar, Khandekar Rajiv

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the magnitude and determinants of refractive error among school children of Lalitpur and Bhaktapur districts in Kathmandu Valley of Nepal.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A descriptive study was carried out in 2003 in four schools; two in each district. A detailed ocular examination was conducted of all children attending these schools and that included visual acuity testing, slit lamp examination, fundus evaluation, retinoscopy, cycloplegic refraction and subjective refraction. Myopia was defined as more than -0.5 D and hypermetropia was defined as error of more than +1 D.

RESULTS

A total of 2000 students of 5-16 years of age were examined. The prevalence of refractive error was 8.60% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.37-9.83). The prevalence of myopia was 6.85% (95% CI 5.74-7.96). The best-corrected visual acuity was 6/9 or less in the eye of 12.8% children with refractive error.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive error is of public health magnitude among school children of 14-16 years of age. School screening program in countries like Nepal for early detection of treatable disease is useful to detect and correct refractive error in older students.

Для цитирования: Adhikari Srijana, Nepal Bhagwat P, Shrestha Jeevan Kumar, Khandekar Rajiv. Magnitude and determinants of refractive error among school children of two districts of Kathmandu, Nepal.. Oman journal of ophthalmology. 2013. DOI: 10.4103/0974-620x.122272.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.