Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025
Economic Evaluation of Two Scalability Strategies for Nationwide Dissemination of an Occupational Sun Safety Intervention in a Randomized Trial.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meenan Richard, Buller David B, Berteletti Julia, Henry Kimberly L, Buller Mary Klein, Cutter Gary R, Pagoto Sherry, Adjei Irene, Chirico Noah
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: An economic evaluation of methods for scaling up the Go Sun Smart at Work (GSS@W) occupational sun protection program was conducted.
METHODS: Regional districts (n = 138) in 21 state departments of transportation were randomized to digital or in-person scalability strategies for GSS@W. Cost of delivering GSS@W was obtained from project accounting records and manager reports. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between digital and in-person strategies was calculated.
RESULTS: Program-delivery costs (in thousands) were $15.6 in digital and $74.3 in in-person strategies. Across all districts, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $3305, representing average cost savings from a sun safety action not implemented under the digital strategy but implemented under the in-person strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: The digital scalability strategy was cost-effective relative to an in-person strategy, generating substantial cost savings and offsetting a lower mean number of implemented program actions.
METHODS: Regional districts (n = 138) in 21 state departments of transportation were randomized to digital or in-person scalability strategies for GSS@W. Cost of delivering GSS@W was obtained from project accounting records and manager reports. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between digital and in-person strategies was calculated.
RESULTS: Program-delivery costs (in thousands) were $15.6 in digital and $74.3 in in-person strategies. Across all districts, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $3305, representing average cost savings from a sun safety action not implemented under the digital strategy but implemented under the in-person strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: The digital scalability strategy was cost-effective relative to an in-person strategy, generating substantial cost savings and offsetting a lower mean number of implemented program actions.