Thorax · 2026
Digital twin-based bronchoscopy simulator improves training performance and skill retention of novices: a randomised controlled study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Mingming, Li Fajiu, Tang Fei, Chen Wei, Wang Feng, Tang Chun-Li, Tong Run, Yang Zhen, Xu Weidong, Zhang Nan, Xia Yang, Li Shiyue, Herth Felix J F, Hou Gang
Аннотация
RATIONALE: Conventional bronchoscopy training often does not ensure lasting skill retention or adaptability to different anatomies, limiting real-world impact. This study used a digital-twin bronchoscopy simulator with various CT-derived bronchial tree models to better train novices.
OBJECTIVES: To explore training with various anatomically diverse bronchial tree models in novices' bronchoscopy performance.
METHODS: 60 bronchoscopy-naive participants were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20 each): control (written instruction only), anatomic-uniformity (trained on one standard bronchial model) and anatomic-variety (trained on multiple patient-derived bronchial models). All participants performed two tests: test 1 on a standard model and test 2 on a new CT-derived model. Both tests were repeated 3 months later to assess skill retention. The primary comparison was between the anatomic-variety and anatomic-uniformity groups.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 60 participants completed tests 1 and 2. 55 returned at 3 months. In test 1, there were no significant differences between the anatomic-variety and anatomic-uniformity groups in diagnostic completeness (DC, 0 segments, p=0.576), structured progress (SP, 1 correct progression, p=0.091) and procedure time (31 s, p=0.831). In test 2, the anatomic-variety group had significantly higher DC (2.5 segments, p<0.001) and SP (9 progression, p<0.001) than the anatomic-uniformity group. At 3 months, the anatomic-variety group retained superior DC and SP scores in both tests despite slight declines.
CONCLUSIONS: Training with diverse anatomical models significantly enhanced bronchoscopy performance compared with repetitive practice on a single standardised model with partially maintained learning gains at 3 months.
OBJECTIVES: To explore training with various anatomically diverse bronchial tree models in novices' bronchoscopy performance.
METHODS: 60 bronchoscopy-naive participants were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20 each): control (written instruction only), anatomic-uniformity (trained on one standard bronchial model) and anatomic-variety (trained on multiple patient-derived bronchial models). All participants performed two tests: test 1 on a standard model and test 2 on a new CT-derived model. Both tests were repeated 3 months later to assess skill retention. The primary comparison was between the anatomic-variety and anatomic-uniformity groups.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 60 participants completed tests 1 and 2. 55 returned at 3 months. In test 1, there were no significant differences between the anatomic-variety and anatomic-uniformity groups in diagnostic completeness (DC, 0 segments, p=0.576), structured progress (SP, 1 correct progression, p=0.091) and procedure time (31 s, p=0.831). In test 2, the anatomic-variety group had significantly higher DC (2.5 segments, p<0.001) and SP (9 progression, p<0.001) than the anatomic-uniformity group. At 3 months, the anatomic-variety group retained superior DC and SP scores in both tests despite slight declines.
CONCLUSIONS: Training with diverse anatomical models significantly enhanced bronchoscopy performance compared with repetitive practice on a single standardised model with partially maintained learning gains at 3 months.