DOI 10.3109/02688697.2014.899318
The nerve of McKenzie: anatomic study with application to intradural rhizotomy for spasmodic torticollis.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Medically recalcitrant spasmodic torticollis may necessitate surgical intervention. One procedure used for this pathologic entity is intradural rhizotomy. However, some patients are symptomatic, perhaps due to an overlooked or underappreciated nerve of McKenzie. The authors' goal was to further elucidate the anatomy of this nerve of the craniocervical junction.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Fifteen adult cadavers (30 sides) underwent microsurgical dissection and observations of the nerve of McKenzie. Morphometrics were performed and anatomic relationships were documented under surgical magnification.
RESULTS
The nerve of McKenzie was found on 70% of sides and was always a single branch. Average length was 5.2 mm for left sides and 6 mm for right sides. Average diameter was 0.9 mm (0.5-1.2 mm). In two specimens, the nerve was found bilaterally. It pierced the first denticulate ligament on 11 sides (52.4%) and travelled through its two prongs on three sides (14.3%) to connect to the anteriorly placed C1 ventral root. On five sides, it was in intimate contact with the adventitia of the vertebral artery. It was more common on right sides and in males, and this was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors identified the nerve of McKenzie in most specimens. This nerve, if overlooked during surgical treatment of spasmodic torticollis, may result in continued symptoms. The nerve of McKenzie was often concealed within the denticulate ligament or adventitia of the vertebral artery. The authors hope the data presented here will aid neurosurgeons and decrease complications in patients who undergo neurotomy for spasmodic torticollis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.