DOI 10.18087/cardio.2019.3.10233
[Polymorphism A1166C of AGTR1 Gene and the State of Intrarenal Blood Flow in Patients with Essential Arterial Hypertension 1-2 Degrees].
Аннотация
AIM: to study relationship between genetic disorders and features of intrarenal blood flow in patients with essential arterial hypertension (AH) of 1-2 degree.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We examined 100 patients (60 women, 40 men) aged 35 to 58 years with 1-2‑degree essential arterial hypertension (AH) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages I-III. Examination included triplex scanning of renal arteries on the ultrasound scanner Vivid-7 Dimension, genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphism А1166С of the AGTR1 gene by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using CKD-EPI formula. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included persons with I and II stage CKD (n=65, 25 men and 40 women), group 2 included patients with stages IIIA and IIIB CKD (n=35, 15 men and 20 women).
RESULTS
Among patients of group 1 prevailed genotype AA, while among group 2 patients prevailed genotype AC. Speed of blood flow in interlobar renal arteries was higher in the group 1 compared with group 2, while in the group 2 time of acceleration of blood flow was higher than in the group 1.
DISCUSSION: The data obtained are indicative of the decrease of systolic, diastolic, and averaged maximal blood flow velocity and the lengthening of acceleration time in patients with higher CKD stage.
CONCLUSIONS
The presence in the genotype of patients with 1-2‑degree AH of AGTR1 1166С allele may be considered a risk factor of early development of CKD. Lowering of speed characteristics of blood flow and lengthening of the acceleration time in patients with AH can be a criterion of hypertensive nephropathy development.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.