Real-World Indirect Treatment Comparison of Terlipressin vs Midodrine Plus Octreotide in Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury.

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on the comparative real-world effectiveness of terlipressin vs midodrine plus octreotide (MO) for hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) in the United Kingdom and the United States is limited.

METHODS

Using individual-level chart review data for patients across the United Kingdom (2013-2017) and the United States (2016-2019), an indirect treatment comparison was conducted comparing the efficacy of terlipressin (UK cohort) with MO (US cohort). Covariate balancing propensity scoring matched the cohorts on baseline serum creatinine (SCr), presence of encephalopathy and/or ascites, albumin use and duration, age, and sex. The primary endpoint was HRS reversal, defined as achieving SCr ≤1.5 mg/dL by the last day of treatment.

RESULTS

At treatment initiation, 90.2% of UK patients received terlipressin (194/215), while 89.2% of US patients received MO (140/157). Concomitant albumin was administered in 67.9% of UK and 98.7% of US patients. In a covariate balancing propensity score-adjusted cohort, HRS reversal was achieved in 53.2% of terlipressin-treated patients (the United Kingdom, weighted effective sample size of 75) compared with 16.9% of MO-treated patients (the United States, n = 89) (adjusted mean difference (95% CI) 36.3% (22.4, 50.2), P < 0.0001). In adjusted analysis, individuals treated with terlipressin experienced an overall reduction in SCr at completion of treatment (SCr decrease 1.00 mg/dL vs increase of 0.08 mg/dL for MO-treated patients, P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION: HRS-AKI treatment and outcomes differ between the United Kingdom and the United States, attributed to the historical standard of care MO in the United States. In adjusted analyses, real-world use of terlipressin was more effective than MO at improving kidney function and achieving HRS-AKI reversal.