Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2021
The Management in Patients With Bilateral Vocal Fold Immobility: 15 Years' Experience at a Tertiary Centre.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Su Wan-Fu, Liu Shao-Cheng, Hsu Ying-Chieh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In order to correct the varying vocal fold positions to meet the various clinical requirements in patients with bilateral vocal fold immobility, we present pertinent surgical methods to treat them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2020, 115 patients diagnosed with bilateral vocal fold immobility were addressed for ventilation in 89 patients and for phonation in 26 patients. In the ventilation surgery group, all the neurogenic subjects received mere suture lateralization (SL) procedures and the mechanical ones underwent arytenoid release (AR) plus SL procedures if the cricoarytenoid joint fixation (CAJF) could be confirmed before operation. In the phonation group, neurogenic subjects received nonsurgical treatment and the mechanical ones underwent AR plus arytenoid adduction (AA) procedure. The decannulation rate and respiratory comfort rate for each subgroup will be calculated and the phonatory tests were conducted.
RESULTS: In the ventilation group, 55% (49/89) of subjects received related surgeries. Mere SL offered 40 successful decannulation or respiratory comfort in 42 neurogenic subjects (95.2%). The single episode rate was high as 95%. An AR plus SL procedure also obtained 100% of decannulation or respiratory comfort with a single episode of surgical procedure if the CAJF could be confirmed preoperatively. In the phonation group, 15% (4/26) of subjects received appropriate surgeries. Single AR plus AA procedures also led to 100% (4/4) of the appropriate candidates serviceable sound.
CONCLUSION: SL procedure keeping intact laryngeal mucosa usually offered permanent glottis enlarging effect or decannulation with a single episode of procedure. The use of arytenoid release for CAJF has led to remarkable advances in the ultimate surgical outcomes of both the ventilation and phonation in terms of decreasing revision surgeries.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: level 4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2020, 115 patients diagnosed with bilateral vocal fold immobility were addressed for ventilation in 89 patients and for phonation in 26 patients. In the ventilation surgery group, all the neurogenic subjects received mere suture lateralization (SL) procedures and the mechanical ones underwent arytenoid release (AR) plus SL procedures if the cricoarytenoid joint fixation (CAJF) could be confirmed before operation. In the phonation group, neurogenic subjects received nonsurgical treatment and the mechanical ones underwent AR plus arytenoid adduction (AA) procedure. The decannulation rate and respiratory comfort rate for each subgroup will be calculated and the phonatory tests were conducted.
RESULTS: In the ventilation group, 55% (49/89) of subjects received related surgeries. Mere SL offered 40 successful decannulation or respiratory comfort in 42 neurogenic subjects (95.2%). The single episode rate was high as 95%. An AR plus SL procedure also obtained 100% of decannulation or respiratory comfort with a single episode of surgical procedure if the CAJF could be confirmed preoperatively. In the phonation group, 15% (4/26) of subjects received appropriate surgeries. Single AR plus AA procedures also led to 100% (4/4) of the appropriate candidates serviceable sound.
CONCLUSION: SL procedure keeping intact laryngeal mucosa usually offered permanent glottis enlarging effect or decannulation with a single episode of procedure. The use of arytenoid release for CAJF has led to remarkable advances in the ultimate surgical outcomes of both the ventilation and phonation in terms of decreasing revision surgeries.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: level 4.