Relative efficacy of minoxidil in combination with other treatments for androgenic alopecia: a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Androgenetic alopecia is the most prevalent form of progressive hair loss. Minoxidil is widely regarded as a standard treatment for this condition. Consequently, we assessed the effectiveness of minoxidil in combination with other pharmacological agents for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted across four databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library-on December 10, 2024. Eligible studies were selected based on the PICOS framework. Data extraction and synthesis were carried out using a Bayesian network meta-analysis, focusing on mean difference and sample size data. League tables and Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values were employed to evaluate the relative efficacy of the interventions.
RESULTS
Among the 20 study groups analyzed, the combination of platelet-rich plasma and basic fibroblast growth factor with minoxidil demonstrated the highest overall efficacy (SUCRA = 93.06%). This combination resulted in a mean increase in hair density of 35.12 hairs/cm2 compared to the group treated with minoxidil alone. In male subgroups, finasteride combined with minoxidil was the most effective treatment (SUCRA = 80.18%). Among seven combination therapies for females, microneedle with minoxidil proved most effective (SUCRA = 87.18%).
CONCLUSION
This study establishes a clinically actionable hierarchy of minoxidil-based combination therapies, providing evidence-based guidance for dermatologists to optimize androgenetic alopecia management.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024623164, identifier CRD42024623164.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.