Acta ophthalmologica · 2011
Non-vitrectomizing vitreous surgery for premacular haemorrhage.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Tsung-Tien, Chuang Chiu-Tung, Sheu Shwu-Jiuan, Chiou Yee-Hsuan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We report three cases illustrating an alternative treatment option for premacular haemorrhage.
METHODS: This retrospective interventional case study included three eyes in three patients with premacular haemorrhage caused by idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in the first case, trauma in the second case and retinal arterial macroaneurysm in the third case. All patients underwent non-vitrectomizing vitreous surgery. Visual acuity as well as slit-lamp and indirect ophthalmoscopic examinations were performed pre- and postoperatively to evaluate the resolution of premacular haemorrhage and changes in lenticular opacity.
RESULTS: At postoperative day 1, visual acuity had improved from counting fingers (CF) to 6/12 in case 1, from CF to 6/20 in case 2 and from CF to 3/60 in case 3. Examination of the fundus showed resolution of the premacular haemorrhage with mild vitreous haemorrhage in all cases. Final best corrected visual acuities were 6/6, 6/7.5 and 6/15, respectively. The lens remained clear in two of two phakic eyes at the last follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: In these selected cases, non-vitrectomizing vitreous surgery was a useful and safe alternative for the treatment of premacular haemorrhage.
METHODS: This retrospective interventional case study included three eyes in three patients with premacular haemorrhage caused by idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in the first case, trauma in the second case and retinal arterial macroaneurysm in the third case. All patients underwent non-vitrectomizing vitreous surgery. Visual acuity as well as slit-lamp and indirect ophthalmoscopic examinations were performed pre- and postoperatively to evaluate the resolution of premacular haemorrhage and changes in lenticular opacity.
RESULTS: At postoperative day 1, visual acuity had improved from counting fingers (CF) to 6/12 in case 1, from CF to 6/20 in case 2 and from CF to 3/60 in case 3. Examination of the fundus showed resolution of the premacular haemorrhage with mild vitreous haemorrhage in all cases. Final best corrected visual acuities were 6/6, 6/7.5 and 6/15, respectively. The lens remained clear in two of two phakic eyes at the last follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: In these selected cases, non-vitrectomizing vitreous surgery was a useful and safe alternative for the treatment of premacular haemorrhage.