Polypropylene Mesh Augmentation in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improves Biomechanical Performance Without Additional Inflammation: A Biomechanical Study in an Animal Model.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of mesh augmentation autografts in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in a rabbit model in vivo.
METHODS
The left rear legs of 72 Japanese white rabbits underwent PCL reconstruction with mesh-augmented autografts (group M), autografts with mesh augmentation and suture tape augmentation (group MSA), and autografts alone (group C). The median portion of the ipsilateral Achilles tendon was used as autograft. Primary outcomes were assessed at 24 weeks postoperatively through biomechanical testing (n = 27), micro-CT evaluation (n = 9), histological staining (n = 9), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis (n = 27).
RESULTS
Compared with autografts alone, mesh-augmented autografts and autografts with mesh and suture tape augmentation showed significantly improved biomechanical stability in terms of ultimate load-to-failure (P < .0001), elongation (P = .0004), and stiffness (P = .0003). Mesh-augmented grafts exhibited an increase in bone mineral density (P = .0487). Histological analysis showed minimal signs of inflammation within the bone tunnels of the grafts. Quantification of inflammatory biomarkers further confirmed the absence of long-term inflammation in any of the samples.
CONCLUSIONS
Mesh-augmented grafts improved biomechanical performance in a rabbit PCL reconstruction model at 24 weeks postoperatively without impairing tendon-bone healing or inducing sustained inflammation.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PCL reconstruction with mesh augmentation, evaluated in vivo in a rabbit model, shows superior biomechanical properties without observed adverse reactions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.