Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026
Soft tissue augmentation options for volume replacement following parotidectomy: A review of the literature.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vyas Udit, Benintendi Isabella, Reece Mac Kenzie, Alwani Mohamedkazim, Johnson R Michael, Wax Mark, Kadakia Sameep
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Salivary gland tumors primarily arise in the parotid gland with surgery representing the cornerstone of treatment. Parotidectomies often lead to a soft tissue deficit that may benefit from reconstruction to reduce incidence of Frey's syndrome, improve aesthetic outcomes, and allow for appropriate postoperative therapies. Several options exist including avascular tissue transfer, locoregional tissue flaps, and microvascular free flaps.
METHODS: This paper is a literature review exploring the efficacy of the various reconstructive options, and includes randomized control trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies from 1999 to 2024.
RESULTS: The literature demonstrates that any reconstructive option is superior to no reconstruction in reducing the risk of FS and in improving cosmetic outcomes without increasing the risk of postoperative complications including hematomas and sialoceles.
CONCLUSIONS: While literature demonstrates that reconstruction is beneficial in parotidectomies, the existing literature does not provide an adequate comparison of options to guide surgeons in making an informed choice.
METHODS: This paper is a literature review exploring the efficacy of the various reconstructive options, and includes randomized control trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies from 1999 to 2024.
RESULTS: The literature demonstrates that any reconstructive option is superior to no reconstruction in reducing the risk of FS and in improving cosmetic outcomes without increasing the risk of postoperative complications including hematomas and sialoceles.
CONCLUSIONS: While literature demonstrates that reconstruction is beneficial in parotidectomies, the existing literature does not provide an adequate comparison of options to guide surgeons in making an informed choice.