Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
Test-retest reliability of early TMS-evoked potentials over fMRI-based definitions of non-motor targets.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sayalı Ceyda, Gogulski Juha, Granö Ida, Jaro Daniel, Weisman Eli, Lofland Gabriela, Lioumis Pantelis, Barrett Frederick S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the test-retest reliability of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) across two cortical regions-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and angular gyrus-in comparison to motor cortex (M1), using individualized and literature-based targeting approaches. The study also compared the reliability of different double-pulse TMS protocols.
METHODS: Seventeen healthy participants underwent two TMS-EEG sessions spaced by at least one week, with targets for DLPFC and angular gyrus identified using resting-state functional connectivity (RS) and Neurosynth-based functional overlays.
RESULTS: M1 demonstrated the highest TEP reliability (Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) mean = 0.59), while DLPFC (CCCmean = 0.40) and angular gyrus (CCCmean = 0.45) showed lower reliability, particularly for anterior DLPFC targets. Neurosynth-based DLPFC targets exhibited slightly higher CCC values (mean CCC = 0.57) compared to RS-based targets (mean CCC = 0.30), but the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in reliability were found across TMS protocols.
CONCLUSION: While fMRI-based targeting optimizes the engagement of functional networks, TMS-EEG needs to prioritize signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to minimize artifacts and maximize reliability.
SIGNIFICANCE: This work bridges the gap between fMRI-guided targeting and TMS-EEG applications.
METHODS: Seventeen healthy participants underwent two TMS-EEG sessions spaced by at least one week, with targets for DLPFC and angular gyrus identified using resting-state functional connectivity (RS) and Neurosynth-based functional overlays.
RESULTS: M1 demonstrated the highest TEP reliability (Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) mean = 0.59), while DLPFC (CCCmean = 0.40) and angular gyrus (CCCmean = 0.45) showed lower reliability, particularly for anterior DLPFC targets. Neurosynth-based DLPFC targets exhibited slightly higher CCC values (mean CCC = 0.57) compared to RS-based targets (mean CCC = 0.30), but the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in reliability were found across TMS protocols.
CONCLUSION: While fMRI-based targeting optimizes the engagement of functional networks, TMS-EEG needs to prioritize signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to minimize artifacts and maximize reliability.
SIGNIFICANCE: This work bridges the gap between fMRI-guided targeting and TMS-EEG applications.