Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in "De Novo" Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Which Technique Is Best?

Background

One of the most debated scientific topics in recent years is the role of non-invasive respiratory support techniques in the treatment of de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Until pre-COVID-19, the most accredited guidelines did not make recommendations for or against the use of these techniques in this clinical condition, and the increased risk of adverse events for patients who failed the non-invasive approach was widely reported in the literature. The most recent guidelines recommend the use of HFNC as a first-line technique in the treatment of de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure to avoid the need for tracheal intubation. However, the strength of these recommendations remains weak, the quality of the underlying evidence is poor, and their usefulness in deciding which technique to apply to an individual patient is questionable. Aim: The aim of this review was to provide the reader with some critical tools to interpret the different indications regarding the choice of the best non-invasive support technique to be used in this setting.

Methods

To this end, we analyzed the available literature on this topic, privileging the works that are most useful in correlating the practical indications to the pathophysiological assumptions. Results and

Conclusions

The notable heterogeneity of the studies on which the current recommendations are based, as well as the affirmation of the concept of patient self-induced lung injury (P-SILI), highlights the importance of assessing each patient's risk of developing this complication, individualizing treatment to the patient's specific needs, and monitoring the patient during treatment.