MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.05.021

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of medicine · 2019

Eosinopenia as an Adverse Marker of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Alkhalil Mohammad, Kearney Aileen, Hegarty Mairead, Stewart Catherine, Devlin Peadar, Owens Colum G, Spence Mark S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Eosinopenia is considered a surrogate of inflammation in several disease settings. Following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, eosinopenia is presumed to be a marker of infarct severity. We sought to study the relationship between eosinopenia and infarct severity and how this relationship determined the long-term outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Six hundred and six consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions from a large volume single center were enrolled. Low eosinophil count was defined as < 40 cells/mL from samples within 2 hours after reperfusion. Primary endpoint was defined as composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned revascularization, and readmission for heart failure over 3.5 years' follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of the patients had eosinopenia. Patients in the low eosinophil group had larger infarct size as measured by troponin value (2934 vs 1177 ng/L, P < .001) and left ventricle systolic function on echocardiography (48% vs 50%, P = 0.029). There was a weak correlation between eosinophil count and both troponin (r = -0.25, P < 0.001) and ejection fraction (r = 0.10, P = .017). The primary endpoint was higher in eosinopenic patients (28.8% vs. 20.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 2.13, P = .023). A discordance between eosinopenia and severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction was observed in 55.6% of cases. Compared with normal count, eosinopenia was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with non-severe left ventricle dysfunction (24.1% vs 16.2%; HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.45, P = .044) but not in those with severe left ventricle dysfunction (42.3% vs. 38.9%; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.03, P = .77) (P < .01 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Eosinopenia is an easily determined marker that reflects worse clinical outcomes over long-term follow-up.

Для цитирования: Alkhalil Mohammad, Kearney Aileen, Hegarty Mairead, Stewart Catherine, Devlin Peadar, Owens Colum G, Spence Mark S. Eosinopenia as an Adverse Marker of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction.. The American journal of medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.05.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.