MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.sup3.s1

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) · 2022

Expert opinion consensus document: management of bladder dysfunction in people with multiple sclerosis.

Thomas Sue, Bradley Joan, Bharadia Trishna, Pomeroy Ian, Roberts Megan, Stross Ruth, Straukiene Agne, Webb Mark, Yates Ann, Young Jane

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The neurogenic bladder is associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI), which is a leading cause of hospital admission in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and thus imposes a significant health economic burden on the NHS. The last UK consensus document on the management of the bladder in multiple sclerosis (MS) was published in 2009. This document, based on a consensus panel meeting discussion and literature search, updates that guidance. It presents new, evidence-based recommendations relating to the assessment of the lower urinary tract in PwMS, first- and second-line treatments of impaired voiding, and medications for overactive bladder symptoms. There is also guidance on how to promote patient self-management, including the use of home testing kits and patient-initiated follow-up. A key recommendation is the need for a national bladder pathway for PwMS. The consensus panel had a multidisciplinary membership and included two PwMS with first-hand experience of bladder problems.

Для цитирования: Thomas Sue, Bradley Joan, Bharadia Trishna, Pomeroy Ian, Roberts Megan, Stross Ruth, Straukiene Agne, Webb Mark, Yates Ann, Young Jane. Expert opinion consensus document: management of bladder dysfunction in people with multiple sclerosis.. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing). 2022. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.sup3.s1.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.