MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000545194

Медицинская библиотека · Skin appendage disorders · 2025

Management and Genetics of Alopecia Areata within the USA: A Cross-Sectional Study of All of Us.

Gupta Aditya K, Economopoulos Vasiliki

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia areata (AA) is a difficult to treat and appearance altering disorder affecting up to 2% of people during their lifetime. Understanding current management trends will help in improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of comorbid disorders and demographic factors on the management of AA and determine the influence of previously discovered genetic factors in different ethnic groups.

METHODS

We used the All of Us controlled dataset (version 7) and examined electronic health record and genomic data from 206,173 participants in a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in outpatients in the USA.

RESULTS

We found that AA patients with comorbid atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and vitiligo were more likely to have been prescribed topical corticosteroids. Patients that were not of European/Caucasian ancestry were less likely to be prescribed any type of corticosteroid. We also found that specific genetic variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms) that increased or decreased risk in European/Caucasian participants did not necessarily have the same effect in other ethnicities (Hispanics and blacks).

CONCLUSION

This work has helped uncover the state of AA care within the USA and has identified access to healthcare inequities in different ethnic populations.

Для цитирования: Gupta Aditya K, Economopoulos Vasiliki. Management and Genetics of Alopecia Areata within the USA: A Cross-Sectional Study of All of Us.. Skin appendage disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1159/000545194.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.