Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018
The clinical value of the multi-channel PVEP and PERG in the diagnosis and management of the patient with pituitary adenoma: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lachowicz Ewelina, Lubiński Wojciech
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present a patient with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma and progressive visual pathway dysfunction detected in the electrophysiological tests in one-year follow-up. Patient is a 59-year-old male with a non-secreting pituitary macroadenoma.
METHODS: Routine ophthalmological evaluation, standard automatic perimetry (SAP), retinal nerve fibers layer and the ganglion cell complex thickness in optical coherent tomography (OCT), as well as electrophysiological examinations (pattern electroretinogram-PERG, multi-channel pattern visual evoked potentials-multi-channel PVEPs record according to ISCEV standards) were performed. The examination and additional tests were conducted 3 times (in 0, 6 and 12 months) and 6 months after neurosurgery.
RESULTS: Visual acuity, funduscopic examinations, SAP, OCT and electrophysiological test results at the first visit were all normal. In both eyes, the abnormalities were observed only in the multi-channel PVEP and PERG despite the absence of the changes in the routine ophthalmological examination and additional tests after 6- and 12-month follow-up. The tumor growth but without chiasmal compression was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. The progression of the optic pathway dysfunction in the electrophysiological tests was a cause of surgical removal of the pituitary tumor.
CONCLUSION: This case highlights novel observations that in patients with pituitary tumor, detection of the early dysfunction of the visual pathway may lead to modification of the medical treatment regimen and reduce the incidence of irreversible optic nerve damage.
METHODS: Routine ophthalmological evaluation, standard automatic perimetry (SAP), retinal nerve fibers layer and the ganglion cell complex thickness in optical coherent tomography (OCT), as well as electrophysiological examinations (pattern electroretinogram-PERG, multi-channel pattern visual evoked potentials-multi-channel PVEPs record according to ISCEV standards) were performed. The examination and additional tests were conducted 3 times (in 0, 6 and 12 months) and 6 months after neurosurgery.
RESULTS: Visual acuity, funduscopic examinations, SAP, OCT and electrophysiological test results at the first visit were all normal. In both eyes, the abnormalities were observed only in the multi-channel PVEP and PERG despite the absence of the changes in the routine ophthalmological examination and additional tests after 6- and 12-month follow-up. The tumor growth but without chiasmal compression was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. The progression of the optic pathway dysfunction in the electrophysiological tests was a cause of surgical removal of the pituitary tumor.
CONCLUSION: This case highlights novel observations that in patients with pituitary tumor, detection of the early dysfunction of the visual pathway may lead to modification of the medical treatment regimen and reduce the incidence of irreversible optic nerve damage.