Brain stimulation · 2016
Treatment-emergent mania/hypomania during antidepressant treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brunoni André R, Moffa Adriano H, Sampaio-Júnior Bernardo, Gálvez Verònica, Loo Colleen K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Treatment-emergent mania/hypomania (TEM) is a possible adverse effect of pharmacological and non-pharmacological antidepressant treatments.
OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of TEM in depressed patients during randomized, sham-controlled trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES: Medline database, from the first date available to August 12, 2016.
RESULTS: From 283 references, 10 RCTs were identified. Only 3 of them described TEM. In active and sham groups, respectively, only 8 of 226 (3.5%) and 1 of 190 (0.5%) participants presented TEM. This difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 0.6 to 5.32). There were also five additional reports of TEM in participants not on RCTs. No risk factors for TEM were identified.
LIMITATIONS: Low number of studies and TEM reports.
CONCLUSION: Despite previous reports, active vs. sham tDCS was not associated with a significantly greater number of TEM episodes.
OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of TEM in depressed patients during randomized, sham-controlled trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES: Medline database, from the first date available to August 12, 2016.
RESULTS: From 283 references, 10 RCTs were identified. Only 3 of them described TEM. In active and sham groups, respectively, only 8 of 226 (3.5%) and 1 of 190 (0.5%) participants presented TEM. This difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 0.6 to 5.32). There were also five additional reports of TEM in participants not on RCTs. No risk factors for TEM were identified.
LIMITATIONS: Low number of studies and TEM reports.
CONCLUSION: Despite previous reports, active vs. sham tDCS was not associated with a significantly greater number of TEM episodes.