Behavioral sleep medicine · 2024
Psychometric Evaluation of the Insomnia Severity Index in Nurses.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagy Samantha M, Emert Sarah E, Leete Jacqueline J, Taylor Daniel J, Dietch Jessica R, Slavish Danica C, Ruggero Camilo J, Kelly Kimberly
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Examine psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in a sample of nurses.
METHOD: In a sample of day shift nurses (N = 289), a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent and discriminant validity analyses, and a test-retest reliability analysis were performed.
RESULTS: CFA showed that a two-factor model provided the best fit. The ISI had moderate to poor convergent validity with sleep diary parameters, and moderate convergent validity with the Sleep Condition Indicator (r = -.66), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (r = .66), and PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment measure (r = .67). The ISI demonstrated good discriminant validity with the measures Composite Scale of Morningness (r = -.27), Nightmares Disorder Index (r = .25), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (sleep items removed; r = .32), and Perceived Stress Scale (r = .43). The ISI had weaker discriminant validity with the PHQ-9 (r = .69) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (r = .51). The ISI demonstrated a good test-retest reliability (ICCs = .74-.88).
CONCLUSIONS: The ISI is a psychometrically strong measure for the assessment of insomnia severity in day shift nurses. Overlap with psychological symptoms, primarily anxiety and depression, suggests caution while interpreting these constructs.
METHOD: In a sample of day shift nurses (N = 289), a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent and discriminant validity analyses, and a test-retest reliability analysis were performed.
RESULTS: CFA showed that a two-factor model provided the best fit. The ISI had moderate to poor convergent validity with sleep diary parameters, and moderate convergent validity with the Sleep Condition Indicator (r = -.66), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (r = .66), and PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment measure (r = .67). The ISI demonstrated good discriminant validity with the measures Composite Scale of Morningness (r = -.27), Nightmares Disorder Index (r = .25), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (sleep items removed; r = .32), and Perceived Stress Scale (r = .43). The ISI had weaker discriminant validity with the PHQ-9 (r = .69) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (r = .51). The ISI demonstrated a good test-retest reliability (ICCs = .74-.88).
CONCLUSIONS: The ISI is a psychometrically strong measure for the assessment of insomnia severity in day shift nurses. Overlap with psychological symptoms, primarily anxiety and depression, suggests caution while interpreting these constructs.