Journal of dentistry · 2007
Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdalla Ali I, Garcia-Godoy Franklin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in Class V carious lesions with and without acid etching procedures.
METHODS: A total of 183 Class V carious cavities with incisal margins in enamel and gingival margins in cementum were selected and restored with Futurabond NR self-etch adhesive and resin composite Grandio. Restorations were made using three different techniques; after etching of the enamel, after etching the whole cavity for 20s and without acid etching (control). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 2 years using USPHS criteria.
RESULTS: No loss of restorations was recorded after 1 and 2 years for all the three restorative techniques. There was no significant difference between the baseline and 2-year results for any of the tested technique. However, restorations made after acid etching showed less marginal discoloration at the enamel margins.
CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of Futurabond NR self-etch adhesive was excellent after 2 years. Acid etching of the enamel margin or the whole cavity did not improve the overall quality of the restorations, but displayed less marginal discoloration.
METHODS: A total of 183 Class V carious cavities with incisal margins in enamel and gingival margins in cementum were selected and restored with Futurabond NR self-etch adhesive and resin composite Grandio. Restorations were made using three different techniques; after etching of the enamel, after etching the whole cavity for 20s and without acid etching (control). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 2 years using USPHS criteria.
RESULTS: No loss of restorations was recorded after 1 and 2 years for all the three restorative techniques. There was no significant difference between the baseline and 2-year results for any of the tested technique. However, restorations made after acid etching showed less marginal discoloration at the enamel margins.
CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of Futurabond NR self-etch adhesive was excellent after 2 years. Acid etching of the enamel margin or the whole cavity did not improve the overall quality of the restorations, but displayed less marginal discoloration.