Cardiovascular journal of Africa · 2022
Prognostic value of myocardial scar in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laymouna Reem, El-Sharkawy Eman, El-Taha Salah, Elfiky Mohamed
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this research was to evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial scar using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four patients with either ICM or NICM underwent CMR with late gadolinium enhancement sequences for assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and detection and quantification of any myocardial scar using three methods: manual, number of segments involved, and percentage of scarred myocardium. Patients were followed up for at least six months for clinical cardiac events.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups: group I, patients with ICM (58%) and group II, those with NICM (42%). Clinical presentation ranged from eventless lpar;10%) to chest pain (18%), heart failure (15%), hospitalisation (35%), syncope (1%), ventricular tachycardia (< 1%) and cardiac arrest (< 1%). The scar mass was larger in size in group I (17 ± 15%) than in group II (8 ± 13%). A direct relationship was observed between scar size and event severity (p < 0.001). An inverse relationship between LVEF and event severity was found in group I (p < 0.001) but not in group II (p = 0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial scar size was a strong predictor of clinical outcome in both the ICM and NICM patients. LVEF was less reliable in predicting morbidity in cardiomyopathy patients.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four patients with either ICM or NICM underwent CMR with late gadolinium enhancement sequences for assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and detection and quantification of any myocardial scar using three methods: manual, number of segments involved, and percentage of scarred myocardium. Patients were followed up for at least six months for clinical cardiac events.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups: group I, patients with ICM (58%) and group II, those with NICM (42%). Clinical presentation ranged from eventless lpar;10%) to chest pain (18%), heart failure (15%), hospitalisation (35%), syncope (1%), ventricular tachycardia (< 1%) and cardiac arrest (< 1%). The scar mass was larger in size in group I (17 ± 15%) than in group II (8 ± 13%). A direct relationship was observed between scar size and event severity (p < 0.001). An inverse relationship between LVEF and event severity was found in group I (p < 0.001) but not in group II (p = 0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial scar size was a strong predictor of clinical outcome in both the ICM and NICM patients. LVEF was less reliable in predicting morbidity in cardiomyopathy patients.