Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) · 2005
The effect of different desensitizing agents on initial demineralization of human root dentin.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gernhardt Christian Ralf, Aschenbach Kristin, Bekes Katrin, Schaller Hans-Guenter
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the caries-protective effect of 3 different desensitizing agents (Seal & Protect 2.0, D/Sense 2, and Gluma Desensitizer) on root dentin in vitro.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: The root surfaces of 60 freshly extracted, caries-free human molars were used. After removing the cementum, the teeth were coated with an acid-resistant nail varnish, exposing 2 rectangular windows of 2 X 3 mm each on the root surface. One window served as an untreated control, and the other window was treated with 1 of the desensitizing agents. The specimens were randomly distributed among the following experimental groups: group A, D/Sense 2; group B, Seal & Protect 2.0; and group C, Gluma Desensitizer. Subsequently, all specimens were demineralized for 14 days with acidified gel (HEC, pH 4.8, 37 degrees C). Two dentinal slabs were cut from each window. The slabs were ground to a thickness of 80 microm and immersed in water. The demineralization depth was determined using a polarized light microscope.
RESULTS: The nontreated control specimens showed lesions with a mean depth of 84.9 microm (+/- 6.0). In the specimens treated with the desensitizing agents, lesion depth was generally significantly reduced. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower values for the specimens in group B in comparison with the others.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of an in vitro investigation, it can be concluded that the demineralization of the root surface can be hampered by applying the desensitizing agents tested.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: The root surfaces of 60 freshly extracted, caries-free human molars were used. After removing the cementum, the teeth were coated with an acid-resistant nail varnish, exposing 2 rectangular windows of 2 X 3 mm each on the root surface. One window served as an untreated control, and the other window was treated with 1 of the desensitizing agents. The specimens were randomly distributed among the following experimental groups: group A, D/Sense 2; group B, Seal & Protect 2.0; and group C, Gluma Desensitizer. Subsequently, all specimens were demineralized for 14 days with acidified gel (HEC, pH 4.8, 37 degrees C). Two dentinal slabs were cut from each window. The slabs were ground to a thickness of 80 microm and immersed in water. The demineralization depth was determined using a polarized light microscope.
RESULTS: The nontreated control specimens showed lesions with a mean depth of 84.9 microm (+/- 6.0). In the specimens treated with the desensitizing agents, lesion depth was generally significantly reduced. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower values for the specimens in group B in comparison with the others.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of an in vitro investigation, it can be concluded that the demineralization of the root surface can be hampered by applying the desensitizing agents tested.