m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024

Oncological resection and perioperative outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matched international multicenter cohort study.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Uijterwijk Bas A, Moekotte Alma, Boggi Ugo, Mazzola Michele, Groot Koerkamp Bas, Dalle Valle Raffaele, Koek Sharnice, Bolm Louisa, Mazzotta Alessandro, Luyer Misha, Goh Brian K P, Suarez Muñoz Miguel A, Björnsson Bergthor, Kazemier Geert, Ielpo Benedetto, Pessaux Patrick, Kleeff Jorg, Ghorbani Poya, Mavroeidis Vasileios K, Fusai Giuseppe K, Salvia Roberto, Zerbi Alessandro, Roberts Keith J, Alseidi Adnan, Al-Sarireh Bilal, Serradilla-Martín Mario, Vladimirov Miljana, Korkolis Dimitris, Soonawalla Zahir, Gruppo Mario, Bouwense Stefan A W, Vollmer Charles M, Behrman Stephen W, Christein John D, Besselink Marc G, Abu Hilal Mohammed, International Study Group on non-pancreatic periampullary Cancer (ISGACA)

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) typically presents at an early stage due to biliary obstruction and therefore might be specifically suitable for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). However, studies assessing MIPD specifically for AAC, including the robotic and laparoscopic approach, are limited. The aim of this study is to compare short- and long-term oncological resection and perioperative outcomes of robotic (RPD), laparoscopic (LPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) performed specifically for AAC.

METHODS: In this multicenter international cohort study, encompassing 35 centers from 11 countries, MIPD versus OPD and subgroup analyses of LPD versus RPD were undertaken. The primary outcomes regarded the oncological resection (R1 resection rate, lymph node yield) and 5-years overall survival. Secondary outcomes were perioperative outcomes (including intra-operative variables, surgical complications and hospital stay).

RESULTS: In total, patients with AAC who underwent OPD (1721) or MIPD (141) were included. After propensity-score matching, 134 patients per cohort were included. The MIPD group consisted of 53 RPDs and 71 LPDs (50 per group after PSM). There was no difference in overall survival between MIPD and OPD (61.6 % vs 56.2 %, P = 0.215). In the MIPD group, operative time was longer (439 vs 360 min, P < 0.001). Between RPD and LPD, overall survival was not significantly different (75.8 % vs 47.4 %, P = 0.098) and lymph node yield was higher in RPD (21 vs 18, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients with AAC seem to have comparable oncological resection and perioperative outcomes from MIPD compared to the traditional OPD. Both RPD as LPD appear to be safe alternatives for patients with AAC, which warrants confirmation by future randomized studies.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты