Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2008
[Aniridia intraocular lenses in eyes with traumatic iris defects].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmitz K, Viestenz A, Meller D, Behrens-Baumann W, Steuhl K-P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Globe injuries frequently are the cause of permanent loss of visual function. Especially ruptures of the globe have a 50 times lower chance of achieving a final visual acuity better than 20/200 as compared to contusions of the globe. Besides injury to the retina and choroids, injury of the iris-lens diaphragm plays an important role for visual rehabilitation (10% iris defects and 1% aniridia after blunt trauma). Against this background the surgical results after implantation of aniridia intraocular lenses were investigated.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (41.9+/-19.6 years of age) after globe injury (three ruptures of the globe, eight penetrating injuries with trauma of the iris) were implanted with an aniridia IOL.
RESULTS: The implantation of an aniridia IOL was performed on average 1.0+/-0.6 years (range: 0.4-2.3 years) after the primary injury. In ten eyes an aniridia IOL model HMK ANI 2 (Ophtec/Polytech) was implanted and in one eye an aniridia IOL model 67 (Morcher). Most patients were very satisfied with the results achieved (average corrected visual acuity 0.48; 0.05-1.0). Of the operated eyes, 63% reached a visual acuity > or = 0.4. All patients noticed a significant reduction in glare disability as compared to the preoperative condition. The incidence of secondary glaucoma remained unchanged after the secondary implantation. One patient demonstrated retinal detachment 3 months after receiving the secondary implant, which was successfully treated with vitrectomy and gas tamponade.
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of aniridia IOLs seems to be a beneficial therapeutic option in post-traumatic eyes with partial or complete aniridia and aphakia with good visual recovery. During the postoperative follow-up special attention must be paid to sufficient regulation of intraocular pressure and to the retinal situation.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (41.9+/-19.6 years of age) after globe injury (three ruptures of the globe, eight penetrating injuries with trauma of the iris) were implanted with an aniridia IOL.
RESULTS: The implantation of an aniridia IOL was performed on average 1.0+/-0.6 years (range: 0.4-2.3 years) after the primary injury. In ten eyes an aniridia IOL model HMK ANI 2 (Ophtec/Polytech) was implanted and in one eye an aniridia IOL model 67 (Morcher). Most patients were very satisfied with the results achieved (average corrected visual acuity 0.48; 0.05-1.0). Of the operated eyes, 63% reached a visual acuity > or = 0.4. All patients noticed a significant reduction in glare disability as compared to the preoperative condition. The incidence of secondary glaucoma remained unchanged after the secondary implantation. One patient demonstrated retinal detachment 3 months after receiving the secondary implant, which was successfully treated with vitrectomy and gas tamponade.
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of aniridia IOLs seems to be a beneficial therapeutic option in post-traumatic eyes with partial or complete aniridia and aphakia with good visual recovery. During the postoperative follow-up special attention must be paid to sufficient regulation of intraocular pressure and to the retinal situation.