Retinal cases & brief reports · 2026
LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF A COMPLEX CASE OF FOLDABLE CAPSULAR VITREOUS BAG IMPLANTATION.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Christou Louise, Coupland Sarah E, Hunter Guy, Hussain Rumana
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The Foldable Capsular Vitreous Bag (FCVB) implant is useful in maintaining an ocular structure in cases of chronic hypotony secondary to trauma or repeated surgery. There are a few published reports of long-term outcomes and no indication of the chronic cellular changes of the adjacent tissues associated with FCVB implantation. We describe one of the few FCVB cases in the United Kingdom and present histological findings associated with it following secondary enucleation.
METHODS: A 33-year-old man underwent a left primary globe repair following a left penetrating injury and intraocular metal foreign body secondary to a close-range blast injury. Postoperatively, a retinal detachment was detected, and a left vitrectomy with lensectomy, retinectomy, and silicone oil insertion was performed. Subsequently, pupillary prolene sutures were used to create a two-chamber eye. Despite this, hypotony, silicone oil in the anterior chamber, and upper limb deep vein thromboses occurred postoperatively. He had a complex history of Factor V Leiden with renal thrombosis in childhood. After warfarinisation, his FCVB procedure was uneventful with a good bag silicone oil fill.
RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes were initially favorable; however, enucleation was necessary almost 3 years postimplantation due to spontaneous left hyphema and intractable raised intraocular pressure. Histology revealed extensive intraretinal fibrotic pannus membranes, loss of photoreceptor architecture, and focal foreign body-cell reaction.
CONCLUSION: A complex case of FCVB implantation following ocular trauma with postoperative complications years later. Long-term outcomes of FCVBs are poorly understood; this case was complicated by the patient's systemic coagulopathy.
METHODS: A 33-year-old man underwent a left primary globe repair following a left penetrating injury and intraocular metal foreign body secondary to a close-range blast injury. Postoperatively, a retinal detachment was detected, and a left vitrectomy with lensectomy, retinectomy, and silicone oil insertion was performed. Subsequently, pupillary prolene sutures were used to create a two-chamber eye. Despite this, hypotony, silicone oil in the anterior chamber, and upper limb deep vein thromboses occurred postoperatively. He had a complex history of Factor V Leiden with renal thrombosis in childhood. After warfarinisation, his FCVB procedure was uneventful with a good bag silicone oil fill.
RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes were initially favorable; however, enucleation was necessary almost 3 years postimplantation due to spontaneous left hyphema and intractable raised intraocular pressure. Histology revealed extensive intraretinal fibrotic pannus membranes, loss of photoreceptor architecture, and focal foreign body-cell reaction.
CONCLUSION: A complex case of FCVB implantation following ocular trauma with postoperative complications years later. Long-term outcomes of FCVBs are poorly understood; this case was complicated by the patient's systemic coagulopathy.